dismissed that as a conspiracy theory as well. a lot of this is just spreading online but also at the same time, just because these theories are spreading online, it does not mean they are massively being believed by the majority of republicans. being believed by the ma ority of remnant being believed by the ma ority of reublicans. ., ~ . ., republicans. thank you so much for talkin: to republicans. thank you so much for talking to our republicans. thank you so much for talking to our british republicans. thank you so much for talking to our british audience, - republicans. thank you so much for talking to our british audience, we | talking to our british audience, we appreciated. so let s take a look at some of the front pages. we start with daily mail. guardian says labour cuts ties with the rochdale candidate over israel comment and also pressure on netanyahu over at rafah offensive. and the ft, privately private equity boss as shares rise by $40 billion as assets s
governor, josh shapiro joins us this sunday, just days before the most consequential midterm election in years, the vicious attack on a pelosi s husband are raising fears of political violence. in her first statement since her husband was attacked in their home a hammer, attempted to tie him up. and said that they would wait until, quote, nancy got home. to be clear they hope it s a final winning message for democrats. joining me now, in an exclusive interview, white house press secretary something that all of us need to say. it should be done in one voice. sadly, it has become political. we need to end this. this is about the president has said multiple times. he has talked about it in his speeches and other remarks. the thing that is probably most haunting about when we hear of the reports of this assailant, this attacker, that you were speaking of. he was yelling out the things we heard during january six. which is, where is nancy? again, we need to end this type
He should not be your senator from wisconsin! quite the passionate statement from the former president. my question is, why is the former president making this case and not the current president? i would disagree with that characterization of your question. or how it was characterized. the president has been talking about this almost every day for months now. he has been talking about the choices that are at stake here, which is what i was just talking about a moment ago which is, what republicans are trying to do. congressional republicans are trying to take away in the social security. they want to chop it off. they want to put it on the talking block. the president has been saying this. it s why he has taken every action he can to make sure we strengthened medicare, right? that is why the inflation reduction act has been very important, critical, why it will lower cost for americans.
The media let him get off way too easy on this. harris: let s move on. we can talk all day, but the show is only an hour. former president obama s big payday on wall street, let s talk about that. he s expecting millions more. it s trying some new scrutiny. may be inside own party. why lawmakers could put his pension on the talking block. talk money to me, baby. you think traffic s bad now, the future s going to be a nightmare! does nobody like the future? c mon, the future. he obviously doesn t know intel is helping power autonomous cars and the 5g network they connect to. with this, won t happen in the future. thanks, jim.