Stay updated with breaking news from Tad extreme. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
this is something the president predicted was right was never a legal basis for this, correct? president trump won the legal argument today. and the supreme court came out on his side and lifted the stay that the appeals court put in place. but the legal argument was never the strongest argument against the ban. it s the policy argument. really bad policy. tucker: will you concede that there was a legal argument against it, that the left as a group made and it was that a single judge in hawaii had more power over america s foreign policy and control of america s borders than the president did and the supreme court today said that s absurd. it wasn t just hawaii, tucker. there were a number of court cases in a number of courts that stayed this travel order. and it was a close call legally. it was a close call for the appeals court that upheld the stay. it was also a close call for the supreme court. tucker: the president has got a right to make judgments like this and enfor ....
that s why we have a president. you will concede that. i think that s a valid argument and that s the argument that was made. that s one of the arguments that persuaded the supreme court today. although, keep in mind, that the court only lifted the stay. it will hear the merits of the case in october. but, yes, you are right. but, as i said, the stronger argument against this travel ban is it s really bad policy. it doesn t accomplish the goal which is no-to-make america safer. tucker: it doesn t. you would argue the counter case that the more immigrants that we have from say somali coming into the country the safer we are? what point are you making. what i would argue on policy grounds this ban is both too broad and not broad enough. let me explain. here s why it s too broad. it denies muslims from six predominantly muslim countries. tucker: let me stop and correct you. it makes no reference to religion at all. it doesn t badge muslims. it bans people who live in six coun ....
That have socialist jeandz. i agendas and i m all for free speech why are tax dollars funding them? i don t know. the latest one is tag redick lus. little bit immigration and lesbian falls in love with ice agent and that s the latest one. they all have different themes based on liberal socialism and apparently tax dollars are going to fund them. so i find it a tad extreme only because, you know, conservatives have been targeted for a long time by the federal government but apparently we can support socialist agendas with our taxpayer dollars. tucker: does federal art grant money ever go to like some right far out right wing group? it always geese to singular people. i would like to get penalty funding. beautiful conservative photos of reagan. tucker: how about if you like the art you can buy it. you like that? personal choice. ....
Have socialist agendas and i m all for free speech why are tax dollars funding them? i don t know. the latest one is a tad ridiculous. little bit about immigration and some lesbian nature something falls in love with ice agent and that s the latest one. they all have different themes based on liberal socialism and apparently tax dollars are going to fund them. so i find it a tad extreme only because, you know, conservatives have been targeted for a long time by the federal government but apparently we can support socialist agendas with our taxpayer dollars. tucker: does federal art grant money ever go to like some right far out right wing group? it always goes to the same group of people. beautiful conservative photos of reagan. tucker: how about if you like the art, you can buy it. you like that?f personal choice. tucker: that s a weird story. ....
$500,000 to promote plays that have socialist jeandz. i agendas and i m all for free speech why are tax dollars funding them? i don t know. the latest one is tag redick lus. little bit immigration and lesbian falls in love with ice agent and that s the latest one. they all have different themes based on liberal socialism and apparently tax dollars are going to fund them. so i find it a tad extreme only because, you know, conservatives have been targeted for a long time by the federal government but apparently we can support socialist agendas with our taxpayer dollars. tucker: does federal art grant money ever go to like some right far out right wing group? it always geese to singular people. i would like to get penalty funding. beautiful conservative photos of reagan. tucker: how about if you like the art you can buy it. you like that? ....