lot of these other scenarios become a possibility. risk of us potentially losing control of some weaponized a.i. system, that s not something that we can t rule out. lawrence: i m just curious, dan, will a.i. always need humans to control it or does the technology really have the capability eventually to move on its own? so, the people developing the a.i. systems are trying to as quickly as possible make it so that they don t need people. they are trying to automate as many jobs as possible so as a lot of people are trying to make it the case they are autonomous and don t require human intervention and make decisions faster and better than people. that s what the current incentives are and that s what a lot of researchers are trying to do for good or bad. lawrence: yeah. i don t know how we put the genie back in the bottle. it s kind of how you started this segment. it looks like it s taking off
fan. let s see, oh, reaches totally casual, reaches back, has a phone in his one hand, leans back with his left arm, and a little fist pump and applause next to him. that win and red sox loss drops boston back to the bottom of the al east. time now for the weather and look who is back. meteorologist angie lassman has been avoiding us but now she s here with the forecast. things are looking pretty good and especially in the north east. we re a little hazy out there with smoke still lingering from wildfires in parts of canada, but wildfires are bubbling up in parts of the plains, really southern plains and here s the bulls eye of the area oklahoma, texas, all included in that. hail some maybe an isolated tornado can t rule out. in the gulf of mexico a
question question. there are legitimate questions about him and people feel about his age and the economy, how people feel about his policies. the question is a democratic playbook that worked in the midterms, does it work when you re the incumbent president, not challenging somebody who made those policies? i do think you can t rule out who biden could be run ning against. i think the challenger really does matter here. the set of issues they emerged from the primary and pushing from the primary matters because, as we re talking about, abortion was on the ballot in a lot of places in 2022. it s going to be likelien the ballot coming forward. we re talking about some swing states. and will they run the same playbook, they might try, but
they will fine details, like how things were put together. was it deterioration? i just have one very important question for you before i let you go here. a researcher at the florida international university s institute of environmental excuse me, environment, told cnn, in a recent study he found, this condo showed signs of sinking in the 90s. i m wondering if that can be a factor here. aren t there redundancies built into buildings for sinking? absolutely. it s not something we can t rule out. almost every building settles to some extent. it s just a matter of the soil picks up load and it starts to strain with that. you expect something. that in and of itself isn t unusual. the other factors to think about is, generally, just a uniform
what law enforcement officials said they re most worried about? the biggest thing they re worried about, anderson, is that this threat is not going anywhere. and there is the ability for these bad actors in the united states to have get funding from a lot of different places through the use of cryptocurrency. listen to what the fbi director christopher wray had the say about that. not only would i not want to rule it out, but certainly the possibility of foreign funding or support for domestic violent extremism is something that s particularly high on our priority list because of the challenges it poses. and you can t rule out part of the reason. and that came in response to a question about the use of bitcoin to perhaps fund some of the insurrectionists that took part in the activity on january 6th. the fbi director not ruling that out as a possibility going forward and said something that the fbi is keeping a very close eye on, anderson. same committee you spoke of re