dana: in the meantime we re expecting a series of rapid fire decision in the final days of the term. among those still to come the case of a high school football coach fired for praying on the field and attempt to stop president biden from whether or not regulations should be decided by the white house or the job of congress. looming over all of this a potentially transformative decision on abortion. the court weighing the fate of a 15-week ban on to procedure from the state of mississippi. that decision has the potential to overturn roe v. wade which would end nearly 50 years of precedence. dana: reaction is pouring in after the court decided a new york law restricting guns in public was in violation of the second amendment. for more on that we go to chief legal correspondent shannon bream in washington a lot of takes, yesterday, a lot of hot takes. give us your reasons and informed takes this morning. listen, it was definitely an expansive second amendment-friendl
ban. if you can ban muslims in the name of national security undoubtedly you can insist on vaccine mandates. i think it puts the supreme court in its traditional role of deferring to the president when the president says, look. we need this for public safety. is there something you might be watching for from the court s six justice conservative majority that would say to you maybe they ll do something different this time? what worries you if anything about the argument that the folks on the other side are making? oral argument is kind of a sport, a half hour per side, and would devin cases so tough questions asked of both sides. that is the job of the justices. i think we will be watching for those so-called swing justices, chief justice john roberts as well as brett kavanaugh to see where they are going to land on this issue. i think that, you know, there have been some hostility toward
name of national security undoubtedly you can insist on vaccine mandates. i think it puts the supreme court in its traditional role of deferring to the president when the president says, look. we need this for public safety. is there something you might be watching for from the court s six justice conservative majority that would say to you maybe they ll do something different this time? what worries you if anything about the argument that the folks on the other side are making? oral argument is kind of a sport, a half hour per side, and would devin cases so tough questions asked of both sides. that is the job of the justices. i think we will be watching for those so-called swing justices, chief justice john roberts as well as brett kavanaugh to see where they are going to land on this issue. i think that, you know, there have been some hostility toward some vaccine mandates at the state level but justices gore such and others but those are
with the doj during the biden transition, a professor at her alma mater university of michigan law school who wants you to know they beat ohio state. she has a podcast sisters-in-law. good evening and welcome to you all. indeed, counselor, i d like to begin with you. what signals did your trained ears pick up listening to oral arguments this morning? well, brian, i appreciate the chance for a chuckle. i think that s the last laugh for a while in light of the arguments that we heard today. i think all ears were on some of the justices who might be swing justices, maybe chief justice roberts, maybe justice kavanaugh, maybe justice barrett, but all of them signaled very strongly they would be willing to uphold this mississippi abortion ban after 15 weeks, which of course is much more stringent than we had under roe v. wade, which is the previability standard of 22 to
what signals did your trainers pick up listening to oral arguments this morning? well, brian, i appreciate the chance for because it s the last laugh i will be doing for a while in light of the arguments we heard today. i think all years were on some of the justices who might be swing justices, maybe chief justice roberts, justice kavanaugh, barrett, all of them signaled very strongly an indication that they would be willing to uphold this mississippi abortion ban after 15 weeks, which of course is much more stringent than we had under roe v. wade which is the pre viability standard of 22 to 24 weeks. it is not clear whether they are willing to overturn roe v. wade, but i think they can effectively do that in this two step they often like to do. we will not overrule roe v. wade right now, we will just uphold this mississippi law. we are left without the standard that we had before. so essentially, it is all it s