this might be the final throes of the pandemic. let s home it is. very well. we can hope to the new year. we have our shortest break of the hour. just 60 seconds. when we come back, i have a special report looking at the supreme court and the question of not only whether justice kavanaugh lied under oath but how that affects the way the court may rule on the biggest court in decades. i ll see you in one minute. decs i ll see you in one minute stuff. new zzzquil ultra helps you sleep better and longer when you need it most. it s non habit forming and powered by the makers of nyquil. new zzzquil ultra. when you really really need to sleep. it s a thirteen-hour flight, that s not a weekend trip. fifteen minutes until we board. oh yeah, we gotta take off. you downloaded the td ameritrade mobile app so you can quickly check the markets? yeah, actually i m taking one last look at my dashboard before we board. excellent. and you have thinkorswim mobile- -so i can finish analyzing the risk o
an zpreem restrictive mississippi abortion law has many bracing for a reversal of roe v. wade. lawyers arguing before the supreme court in a case pending now that it should still uphold. basically, what the court wanted to do in roe v. wade. but a lot of justices are looking to overturn that women s rights ruling, or even find that mississippi s violating the law because it is too restrictive. the court could upheld to ban while claiming it is not overrooming roe in its entirety. i mention that because that has been a misleading rear guard legal attack on choice that many conservative hello over leaders, i should say, have been using for some time. the court could strike down this ban and keep roe v. wade as law of the land. the administration running the doj decides the final position in these cases. we ve had neal katyal on these
thanks. we ll see ya. ah, they re getting so smart. choose the app that fits your investing style. your shipping manager left to “find themself.” leaving you lost. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. indeed instant match instantly delivers quality candidates matching your job description. visit indeed.com/hire we know what the purpose of this case is and we know why republicans picked the particular justices they picked to be on the supreme court. so it is frankly a matter now of preparing for a return to american women having to seek out illegal abortions, instead of having the right to get one. we don t know exactly when the court will rule but there are pretty grave expectations or the what that ruling will mean.
and other cases. he was the person who did that with obama as solicitor general. and the solicitor general reports to the attorney general. the new attorney general, merrick garland, has been leading the only significance to these southern state bans and accuses them of simply defying, denying and abrogating women s constitutional rights. the obvious and expressly acknowledged intention of this statutory, has been to prevent women from exercising their constitutional rights. that is just legally true. that s not a debate. the supreme court has long ruled these are constitutional rights. in fact, few members of the court will openly say that they will just ignore precedent or reverse that. you may recall this from all the supreme court confirmation hearings which get covered on tv and discussed around the country. it has become kind of a weird
baroque discussion for the republican appointees to say under oath all sorts of words about roe being a type of settled precedent. i understand the importance of the precedent set forth in roe v. wade. i don t think that abortion or the right to abortion is, would change even even some of the restrictions might change? i think the restrictions would change. the supreme court has held in roe v. wade that a fetus is not a person. that s the law of the land. i accept the law of the land. that is the law of the land. all of that was recent. much of it was under oath. that s one reason why these conservative lawyers are trying to lob, it is pretty farfetched legal arguments for the court to you know i try to keep it real with you, overturning roe without overturning roe which is