Been handling the case for the justice department defending what the trump administration was trying to do with the census and he lost that case at the supreme court last week. the justice department conceded as of last night that it s over and the trump administration won t be adding the new question to the census. that it s done. the guy has been handling the case for the justice department lost the case and told the court they are conceding and it s done. now that it s done, that dude has gone on vacation. so why is he back in this hearing today phoning into this emergency hearing? apparently this is not done. if you want to know why he has to call in because it s not done is because of the other guy from the justice department who phoned in with him. the head of the civil division, jeff sessions s recent chief of staff and seen what happens to senior justice department officials in the trump administration when they don t give trump what he wants no matter what it is.
Inner tube. there are inner tube concessions at the border. i m not kidding you, that s a fact. tucker: unbelievable. i m laughing, but the details are great. thank you for bringing them. good to see you. tucker: president trump s travel ban on several countries, was upheld by the supreme court last week. this is a professor at university of detroit school, he says this is white supremacy. professor, thank you for coming on. thank you. tucker: how is it white supremacy, that ban? well, it s basically the continuation of trump s rhetoric but comes with the whole history of sort of white supremacist immigration law that we have had since the founding of this country. you had to be white in order to be naturalized from 1790 until 1952. that was the law for the vast majority of the history of this country. what trump is trying to do is go
They re inner tube concessionsdi at the border. i m not kidding you. that s a fact. unbelievable. i m not kidding. charlie leduff, great to see you. president trump s travel ban on several countries was upheld by the supreme court last week. we have a professor at the university of detroit school of law and say. how is it white supremacy, that ban? y, it s basically the continuation of trump s rhetoric, but comes through the history of white supremacist immigration law we ve had since the founding of this country. you had to be white in order to be naturalized from 1790 until 1952. that was the law for the vast majority of they. history of ths country. trump is trying to go back to
Blueprint for the high court s decision. with us the author of constitutional law court. thanks for being with us. the supreme court essentially sent it back to the state knocking down the marriage ban in california. but not ruling more broadly for the country. why should we be looking closely at what the federal court did in perry? ? that s right. we should look at it. this was as you said the first federal trial. and so it gave us the highest conversation, the highest level conversation we ve ever had in marriage because it was more rigorous, more comprehensive, and it was a human event in a dramatic way that i think made the ultimate case for same-sex marriage. you were at the oral arguments at the supreme court last week. one of the interesting things we could hear from the voices of the justices of the discomfort that i think a lot of people at least older americans voice, which is well even if this might be okay gosh, it seems like a
I asked tim ryan today from ohio, do you want your guy on the republican side, your opponent, do you want him to run against held care? he said, absolutely. he gets it. ohio gets it. this is about winning for american families and for american workers who don t make enough money to buy insurance. they need the democrats, they need to stand strong and defend this law and all of the benefits it s bringing to the american people. just keep one thing in mind throughout all of this, this was a real whammy that was thrown at the republican party by the supreme court last week. they really had no clue how to formulate. they had to go back to old 2009 talking points about patient centered solutions. it s almost comical. they don t have a plan. and they don t want a plan. they have spent generations trying to take down the new deal. and now look what s happened on their watch. more is being added to help americans who want it. where is the country going to go from hire? this is a political ques