Was decidedly conservative, founder of the federalist society, could not could get confirmed unanimously. even sonia sotomayor, who spoke this week about the racism she s felt throughout her career, still got a somewhat lopsided vote. now everything is divided down party lines. you saw republicans talking about how qualified at the timen ji brown jackson is but still sorry, can t vote for her. that s just really sad for americans. the job of the senate is supposed to be to advise and consent. and if the nominee is qualified then that should be the end of the story. but here it s not. the politics are involved. i m not sure what it takes to fix that broken system. i think the politics of the senate are spilling over into this politics of the court, which is also unfortunate. i wish there is a hope for a solution to turn it around because it s bad for our country, bad for democracy. you make an interesting point that we are seeing an erosion of public trust in the institution of the
Supreme Court weist Klage von Texas zurück – Trump: „Man hat uns im Stich gelassen" epochtimes.de - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from epochtimes.de Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
More even more important we overturn citizens united but the point here is much more fundamental. which is a supreme court itself, its legitimacy, its future, is being brought into question and can be really seriously delegitimized if this nomination goes through. something has to be done to make reparation for the theft of the supreme court seat and i think that should be fundamental to the discussion at the confirmation hearings this week. you re hitting the fundamental context and reporting on that earlier in the special, if this was unusual or illegitimate and it is met with a political or legal reward, does that actually serve to further encourage such political behavior, one of the questions we re looking at, former senator russ fine goeeingolfeingold, th joining us today. his ties to russia also under a legal microscope. as gorsuch testifies in one packed room, the lines might be longer at the intelligence
Money or property will be applied used for the use benefit for any support of church system of religion et cetera for use, benefits support of preacher or minister. what is your argument going to be on your petition for rehearing? what they disregarded is the connection of the ten commandments to our code of law. the supreme court itself, you vu have the law givers. there is a purpose here that s different than establishing a particular religion. this is part of a larger debate sean. we re facing here in oklahoma is not something that s lost across the country right now. there is a debate going on about what did the first amendment truly protect? what does it mean to have a right of free exercise? you see the movement nationally of folks trying to eradicate all forms of religion. that s not what our first amendment is aboutment that s not what this provision was
Money or property will be applied used for the use benefit for any support of church system of religion et cetera for use, benefits support of preacher or minister. what is your argument going to be on your petition for rehearing? what they disregarded is the connection of the ten commandments to our code of law. the supreme court itself, you vu have the law givers. there is a purpose here that s different than establishing a particular religion. this is part of a larger debate sean. we re facing here in oklahoma is not something that s lost across the country right now. there is a debate going on about what did the first amendment truly protect? what does it mean to have a right of free exercise? you see the movement nationally of folks trying to eradicate all forms of religion. that s not what our first amendment is aboutment that s not what this provision was