brutal, only a grab bag of objections that simply assert without elaboration, his superior assessment of executive branch interest, insists that congress and the committee have no legitimate legislative interests on the attack on the capitol. and he in putin s the motive of president biden and the house. that falls far short of meeting his burden. and it makes it impossible for this court to find any likelihood of success in his claims. that is all he offers. and that is not close to enough. law he really actually says that. that is all he offers, and that is not close to enough. it is the rare day when a verbatim portion of a federal court ruling belongs on a t-shirt or a crush stitch, bumper sticker, or perhaps, as the permanent caption of a formal presidential portrait. that is all he offers, and that is not close to enough.
Transcripts for CNN Erin Burnett OutFront 20211210 00:06:15 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
handed over, nor has he made even a preliminary showing that the content of any particular document lacks relevance for the committee s investigation chlgt he offers instead, this is brutal, only a grab bag of objections that simply assert without elaboration his superior assessment of executive branch interests, insists that congress and the committee have no legitimate legislative interest in an attack on the capitol, and he impugns the motives of president biden and the house. that falls far short of meeting his burden and makes it impossible for this court to find any likelihood of success in his claims. that is all he offers and that is not close to enough. the ruling actually says that. that is all he offers and that is not close to enough. it is the rare day when a verbatim portion of a federal court ruling belongs on a t-shirt or a cross stitch or a bumper sticker or perhaps as the
being presidential communications. neither has he presented arguments that grapple with the substance of president biden s and congress s weighty judgments of why these documents should be handed over. nor has he made even a preliminary showing that the content of any particular document lacks relevance to the committee s investigation. he offers instead this is brutal only a grab bag of objections that simply assert without elaboration his superior assessment of executive branch interests, insists that congress and the committee have no legitimate legislative interest in the attack on the capitol, and he impugns the motives of president biden and the house. that falls far short of meeting his burden and makes it impossible for this court to find any likelihood of success in his claims. that is all he offers and that is not close to enough. the ruling actually says that. that is all he offers, and that is not close to enough.