you did, though, at the beginning of the segment, martin. what do you mean by that? flaccid, flabby. having watched every moment of it, it seemed to me that what the defense were attempting to do was sell the notion of one man being perpetually weak, though he had been in a gym for a year, against a young man who they were attempting to describe as a superfit athlete that they knew nothing about. you know what? bottom line is, how much does this matter? i mean, let s say he was superweak and wussy, right? when he s down, if he s down, if the jury believes he s down and trayvon martin s on top of him and he s incapable of fighting, first of all, perhaps he shouldn t have been following trayvon martin to begin with if he s not capable of fighting and we don t know how the fight started, but, secondly, is he in reasonable fear of imminent bodily injury or death? even if trayvon martin was superior fighter, had landed a couple of punches on him, you don t get to pull out a gun and