anything, social media has run rampant with it. injunctions have been used to protect certain victims in the case or certain sensitive information when it comes to terrorism in certain cases but when we re talking about someone, a football or athlete, whatever it is, movie star having an affair with someone, why would a judge grant an injunction on that? well, the chief justice made it clear. this is about balancing the right to privacy and freedom of expression and information for the media and that there has to be some kind of a balance there. and so these injunctions have been applied for in the past successfully. the question is how far have they gone. should, for example, is a super injujds simply too limiting where you can t even talk about the fact that there is an injuks. now what they have said is ju t journalists should be allowed in
from being free. deadly attack in pakistan, the americans are in the firing ryan less than a month after their forces killed osama bin laden. and leave new friends behind. the queen s historic visit to ireland is almost over. we begin this hour in washington where israel s prime minister will meet the u.s. president today for what s expected to be a tense round of talks. benjamin netanyahu arrives less than 24 hours after barack obama deliver add big speech on relations in the middle east. he got a frosty reception in israel. it s an idea the u.s. has supported unofficially for years, but no president has ever before stated it. the borders of israel and palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps so secure and recognized borders are established for both states. reporter: in return obama called on them to retain its security and recognize it as a jewish state. the 1967 borders were in place before the six-day war in which israel captured th