conversations being. if that s the case, he s already lost privilege by publicizing whatever it is he has to say. so we have perhaps a protracted litigation, but not one that should result in any way with steve bannon being able to thumb his nose at a congressional subpoena or a former president being able to say, i still want to be in the oval office, even though i m not and the election was fair. remember, timing is important too, right? if we get to the point where hs t this is tied up in litigation, the midterm election politically, there is not enough subpoena support at the leadership level if they take over to keep the committee going. that ll be a sad reality. enough support? is there any? right. i want to ask your opinion, david, about this doj filing that speaks not only to the importance of looking back and holding people to account for their activities on january 6th, but why it is important for the future.