wisconsin. emily: respectfully i think your rendition of this is exactly why we saw the blurring of the lines between the national conversation and when you throw around words like the prosecution did of active shooter richard: that was the prosecution of a stress argument. emily: but it wasn t their language. it wasn t a fact. richard: i clearly said emily: arguing a desire. richard: i clearly said emily: that would have made their case but there is no proving something that doesn t exist. richard: that is my point. greg: there is another issue and that is when you say we need to have a conversation, we hear this a lot, we need to have a conversation. we can t have a conversation when the people you are conversing with our calling you a white supremacist and you are not worthy of conversation. the police, they don t want to have a conversation with the police, that is silly. those guys are racist richard: i think you are
wisconsin. emily: respectfully i think your rendition of this is exactly why we saw the blurring of the lines between the national conversation and when you throw around words like the prosecution did of active shooter richard: that was the prosecution of a stress argument. emily: but it wasn t their language. it wasn t a fact. richard: i clearly said emily: arguing a desire. richard: i clearly said emily: that would have made their case but there is no proving something that doesn t exist. richard: that is my point. greg: there is another issue and that is when you say we need to have a conversation, we hear this a lot, we need to have a conversation. we can t have a conversation when the people you are conversing with our calling you a white supremacist and you are not worthy of conversation. the police, they don t want to have a conversation with the police, that is silly. those guys are racist richard: i think you are