A look at the latest news and headlines of the day features discussions of politics and culture, analysis of political correctness in Campus Craziness and.
be intimidated into accepting your fraudulent promise. it w often works and that s exactly why they do it but it only works when the rest of us play alongng with it so let s sp playing along with it. so, can you explain to me why if it s wrong to meet with russians in the hope of getting dirt on your political opponent, it s okay to pay for a national toor get dirt from russians about your political opponents which the dnc in the hillary campaign both did? it s very different for a campaign to spend money to do opposition research in a foreign country then for a foreign government like the russians to actually invest in disarming our election security to benefit one candidate, that s the big difference here. there s nothing wrong in paying
if there is perjury, convicted for perjury and see if you can convict but let s stop pre
Away with the conclusion that there was no probable cause. they scared a bunch of judges with tense stories about potential russia collusion, the steeleot dossier, the yahoo stoy that was from it and even when he was fired and he was compensated he was on the payroll of the fbi, the dnc, and the hillary clinton campaign at thenc same time even when tht was discovered they continued to use this information indicating they had nothing t else. the idea that the government can spy on political campaigns with no evidence is frightening and needs to be corrected with legislation immediately. tucker:, the precedent this sets, we are all living in this moment and it s hard for us to see a week ahead. you ve been in the white house and political campaigns. there will be another administration and one after that. what does this mean for them? will any president ever be able