overturned, whatever likelihood that might have been, this is likely a return to the states. including justice kavanaugh, why should we just made me neutral again? these are questions that we are still debating 50 years later, shouldn t this be decided by political people because it s a mix of moral and political and social issues, and to leave it at that. what was really fascinating is, cavanagh came out aggressively against the liberal justices saying, you need to uphold roe or we simply don t overturn cases. he read off a list of cases in which they overturn a previous holdings and that those cases were celebrated today. justice breyer who kept on raising this i don t think would blink at reversing heller on second amendment rights or citizens united and do so that was some of the more tense exchanges that occurred between the justices today. you talk about intense but never on civil and we got to see some disagreement. we talk about the court not being political but we
Thank you for explaining that because i think it s important for people to know. i want to hit one more, we have shannon bream in the courtroom standing by. before we go i want to hit one more with you particularly jonathan, specifically what today was about. you heard andy talking about the narrow scope of the issue before the court and trying to keep everyone on that one issue. the 15 weeks, the 24 weeks in roe vs. wade, what s happening in mississippi, stay on mississippi. but certainly there is this idea that is it possible today was about overturning legal abortion in this country? and the way i understand it and certainly the way it was laid out in court today, that wasn t the issue. it really was all about mississippi but if you watch this were there telltale signs of what is to come? i think it s very important to keep in mind that if roe were