Soldiers during the war, so two officers decided to form the nra out of New York for two purposes. One is to facilitate and grow long Range Rifle ranges and the other was to assist the state national guards in mark manship. The nra initially, just so you know, was kind of working to get appropriations from the government and they started off with one organization. They grew to 1,700 by 1929. They also are, just so you know, built on there was an english national rifle association, and they were that was the predecessor in 1859. This was supposed to be the american version. The other thing that really differentiated the two to start off with was the franchise model, you could start and build a Rifle Club locally or statewide and then you were an nra affiliated Rifle Club more or less. Those Rifle Clubs would then compete in state, local and national shooting matches. Based on your research would the early founders of the nra recognize the Organization Today in 2020 . Oh, not at all. The
meeting. the author of the book, armed in america, hadraa history of g rights. thanks for being with us on c-span 3 s american history tv. thank you, steve, for being here. how did the organization come about and why? well, they came about after the civil war where there s poor marketing by officers during it the war so two officers decided to form the nra for two purposes. one is facilitate, build and grow long rifle ranges and assist markmanship. the florida initial sale so you know was kind of working to get appropriations from government, and they started off with one organization. they grew to 1,700 by 1929. they also are just so you know built on there was an enlish national rifle association, and they were this supposed to be the american version. the only thing that really differentiated the two to start off with you could start or build a rifle club locally or statewide and you were an nra affiliated club no less. and those clubs would then compete in sta
congress reacted to snowden and they re saying hmm, maybe it is not quite so scary as we thought to go against the government. i want to move on because of the time. but, mieke, i thought you might have the best view into how might this ruling influence the politics of this, the congressional will? i think that the court the second circuit clearly put this back in congress lap and said, look, congress did not explicitly authorize this bulk collection program under 2150 and if they want to be explicit about that, they need to act they made note of the timeline. but their analysis of the 215 program suggests that they would not look kindly upon it the way that it is currently constructed. i also think that the politics of this right now here in the house, it is unlikely that you would get a clean reauthorization of the existing program through. and so the real question for senator mcconnell is, do you take the reform legislation or do you let the program expire? so to
and i suspect there s also other pieces of legislation that have been introduced on the house and senate site. a good number of cosponsors, there are also builds on the senate side. i can speak more to the house developments and last month during i know david spoke to this, but i think it gave suzan a lot of optimism that the committee chairman goodlatte expressed interest. so though be a lot of consultation with stakeholders in the course of these hearings. the first thing was positive to have. the department of justice has to say there is merit to this idea that we need a warrant standard for stored e-mail content. that was hopeful. i think the remains to be seen kind of what stakeholder concerns there will be your queen of law-enforcement is going to present some information and issues we need to take a careful look at. by no means is the legislation that my boss has cosponsored not open for conversation and consu
we will then hear from elena kagan herself. i m joined by marcia coyle of the national law journal and marcia, the senators are just coming into the room and ms. kagan has come into the room. this is not a day of questions but we re going to get a sense of what the senators want to know from her. that s right, judy, this is opening day. she gets to ss= and listen to 19 senators lay out some of their concerns about her nomination, a lot of the issues they re interested in and then at the end we get to hear a little from her. the chairman, senator patrick lehe, has gotten under way. we ll turn to him. senator sessions and i have discussed this. we re going to recognize senators in order of seniority doing the usual back and forth. senator sessions and i will each give an opening statement and following our opening statement take turns back and forth. i would urge senators to stay i m afraid we re going to have to stay within the 10 minutes simply to keep on schedule, an