dealing with the election could somehow provide a writ for the justices to get involved. if you talk to legal experts it seems a narrow path, but is there a path? yeah, bret, there is certainly a path. the supreme court has stepped in in other criminal cases primarily when the death penalty is at issue and has stayed, you know, the proceedings. but it is not unprecedented. you have bush versus gore and ibm. several cases the supreme court has indicated they will put a freeze and hold on it to see if there are constitutional violations that are significant. dana: brett tollman, thank you. fox news alert because right now we re waiting to hear from former president trump. he is scheduled to speak at a news conference this morning at trump tower just a little 59 minutes from now. that is just one day after he was found guilty on all 34 felony counts in his new york criminal trial. welcome to a new hour of america s newsroom, i m dana perino. bill hemmer is off today. hi
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently published its final Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace. The EEOC also issued supplemental documents.
government has never argued that this plaintiff s status as an unaccompanied minor who enter the united states of that documentation reduces or eliminates her constitutional rights to an abortion in compliance with state law requirements. now, that is the thing that these pro-life groups were worried about, that it would be roe 2.0. it sounds like, during these arguments, the federal government did not say she doesn t have a constitutional right. it has not been seated? is that the case? i think it narrows the holding to this case. i believe the doj should have made that argument. we made it in the brief. it is clear to me that the constitution does not allow for an abortion to somebody that comes here illegally and doesn t have some kind of substantial tiger connection. that was never argued, we argued it. if you look at the dissent, they picked up the argument, i think it is something that hopefully in the future, the doj will argue. shannon: there is a class action lawsuit that
government has never argued that this plaintiff s status as an unaccompanied minor who enter the united states of that documentation reduces or eliminates her constitutional rights to an abortion in compliance with state law requirements. now, that is the thing that these pro-life groups were worried about, that it would be roe 2.0. it sounds like, during these arguments, the federal government did not say she doesn t have a constitutional right. it has not been seated? is that the case? i think it narrows the holding to this case. i believe the doj should have made that argument. we made it in the brief. it is clear to me that the constitution does not allow for an abortion to somebody that comes here illegally and doesn t have some kind of substantial tiger connection. that was never argued, we argued it. if you look at the dissent, they picked up the argument, i think it is something that hopefully in the future, the doj will argue. shannon: there is a class action lawsuit that