survive? how will the court survive. i want to stop right here. this seems to me the most watershed question before the court. will this institution survive the sterchl it creates to do just what she said. the mississippi ban was put in place by people who said we have new jss on the court. they were the justices appointed by donald trump. to the larger question, what damage has been done to the supreme court by the line of questioning about a law that was put in place because of who they were, of who got those spots? i worry deeply about the court s ability to survive what she called that political stench. the idea of stary zisis, that you can t willy-nilly overturn a
decision, which important for our full democracy. it allows us to rely on the facts that the court will poll precedent, won t sway left to right depending on who is president or who is in congress and that there have to be really special circumstances none of which are present here. that is what is so unusual in this argument. they weren t just asking about precedent in stary zisis. several times they said assume this is a matter of first impression, assume we are deciding this for the first time. we are not. we have had five decades of roe. she references other amendments. kavanaugh seems to be saying, hot, potato, send it back to the states. what isn t a hot potato right now is this the right to vote is, donald trump successfully