guess with this kind of majority, evenif guess with this kind of majority, even if some of those who abstained on the second reading, might want to vote against the programme motion, probably the government is still going to survive. in the end, a better day for mr sunak than perhaps some were anticipating. as in truth, often ends up being the case in these occasions, that being said, these occasions, that being said, the government will have used up quite a lot of political capital getting this result and they will be arguments down the track about some of the detail of this bill. let’s of the detail of this bill. let s take a look of the detail of this bill. let s take a look at of the detail of this bill. let s take a look at some - of the detail of this bill. let s take a look at some of - of the detail of this bill. let s take a look at some of the i of the detail of this bill. let s i take a look at some of the legal arguments down the track. we can speak to an im
joe biden, thank you for everything, joe biden. the border is overwhelmed. yesterday s numbers over 9,000. add 1500 got-aways, plus the thousand through the port of entry, it s not slowing down a bit. arizona can t do this alone, nor should we have to. the reality, help is not on the way. sandra: outnumbered and outresource, migrants on the border each and every day. the flow of people is constant day after day after day, and unprecedented levels. live pictures from arizona screen right, and on the left that, is texas. these are checkpoints showing large groups of migrants that have already crossed over and they are waiting to be processed before they come on in. hello, well come, everyone. sandra smith in new york. great to begin another hour with you. john: i m john roberts in washington as we kick off hour two of america reports . lukeville, arizona, quickly becoming a hot bed for smugglers. fox has learned more than 600 migrants arrived there overnight, some
you for this second hour of chris jansing reports. any minute now, president biden will meet with ukrainian president zelenskyy as he makes a direct appeal for u.s. aid for their grueling fight against russia. and it is in russia where allies have imprisoned putin foe navalny are sounding the alarm, saying they haven t heard from him in days and his whereabouts remain unknown. plus, the big cop 28 climate change summit forced into overtime after activists warned a deal was in complete failure. plus, decision day. the embattled president of harvard will keep her job after nearly over a week of outcry over the speech she made about antisemitism. our nbc news reporters are following the latest developments and we start with ukraine s leader sitting down with ukraine s leader sitting down with president biden any minute now. kelly, set the stage for us. the stakes are particularly high and they have been in different ways each time zelenskyy has come to the united states an
about fighting corruption, we should also say specifically, burisma in 2016. mr. yermak provided me a statement. i wanted to be assured that this statement would actually correct the perception that mr. giuliani had of ukraine and what they stand for now so that that would also be conveyed to president trump and solve this problem that i had observed with our may 23rd meeting with the president. the problem being that he is getting a bad set of information, a statement like this could potentially correct that. was mr. guiliani satisfied with the statement? no, he was not. he believed it needed to say burisma and 2016 specifically or else it would not be credible, would not mean anything. so in fact, mr. guiliani wanted a statement that referenced burisma and the 2016 elections explicitly. one that would benefit, essentially, president trump.
it is to invest or come here is the text you sent to the ukrainian official on august august 13th. let s put that up on the screen. you s
giuliani. mr. giuliani said they thought ukraine should make a statement about fighting corruption and mr. yermac provided me a draft statement and i wanted to be assured that this statement would actually correct the perception that mr. giuliani had of ukraine and what they stand for now so that that would also be conveyed to president trump and solve this problem that i had observed with our may 23rd meeting with the president. the problem being that he s getting bad set of information. a statement like this could potentially correct that. so was mr. giuliani satisfied with this statement? no, he was not. why not? he believed it needed to say burisma and 2016 specifically or else it would not be credible, it would not mean anything. so in fact mr. giuliani wanted a statement that referenced burisma and 2016 elections explicitly. one that would benefit
essentially president trump. mr. ambassador, here s the text you sent to the ukrainian official august 13th. you said hey