Of mp5 has of mp5 ha5 found that committee of mps has found that borisjohnson lied about this, he knew he had broken rules, and that he then attempted to intimidate the mps who were investigating him. now, the committee would have recommended a 90 day suspension for boris johnson, but, he already resigned as an mp last week. so, what exactly is in this report? it has been called as damning as it can possibly be. let s get more on what is inside from this report. from this report. looking up a re ort in from this report. looking up a report in detail, from this report. looking up a report in detail, it from this report. looking up a report in detail, it is - from this report. looking up a report in detail, it is clear - from this report. looking up a| report in detail, it is clear that the committee have attempted to go to great lengths to prove the central conclusion, which is that borisjohnson deliberately misled mps. and, here, on page nine, at the start of this lengthy report,
How mps people will then be looking to is how mps react to this. our conservative mps looking at this, do they decide, yes, we want to rally behind they decide, yes, we want to rally behind the they decide, yes, we want to rally behind the committee, the full conservative members on the committee who wrote the sanctions, or do committee who wrote the sanctions, or do we committee who wrote the sanctions, or do we actually want to back up the boris or do we actually want to back up the borisjohnson narrative that this is the borisjohnson narrative that this is a the borisjohnson narrative that this is a sort of unseemly plot to -et this is a sort of unseemly plot to get rid this is a sort of unseemly plot to get rid of this is a sort of unseemly plot to get rid of somebody because he delivered get rid of somebody because he delivered brexit. that is really quite delivered brexit. that is really quite a delivered brexit. that is really quite a testing moment, we wil
Mrjohnson s wife, who the committee say consider cannot be considered as an absolutely necessary participant the installation in the garden of trestle tables, and alcohol available. they say there is evidence of a number of people in attendance increased during the time mrjohnson was at the gathering. and, taking the language of the rules in place at the time of this, backin rules in place at the time of this, back in may 2020, it would have been, we know the gathering, they say, for it to have been combined with the rules, it would have had to have been essential for work purposes. they do not consider, the committee say, that the gathering was held purely for the purposes of raising morale as being essential for work purposes. moreover, they set out in further detail than they do not believe mrjohnson would have advised the public that this was the case had he been asked at the time. so, one example they are via the committee believes that mrjohnson s account of the events and rules