and a great show, as always, an awesome audience. i am laura ingraham. this is ingraham angle from washington tonight. thanks for joining us. biden surrenders. that s the focus of tonight s angle. now, this month, americans cannot turn around without seeing a very colorful flag. it s you see it in stores, at hotels and clothing. of course, it s being pushed by celebrities. it s even hanging prominently at the white house. but there s a flag that far better represents where we re heading as a country right now, although it s a lot less flashy. you see it there. and given biden s groveling approach, china, our single greatest adversary, the white house, might as well raise it this point. now, there are so many obvious reasons why america needs to begin decoupling from. it is insane when you think about it, that we allowed manufacturing and the production of things, prescription drugs, medical devices, critical electronics and other critical parts to be controlled by, a co
the president says he is ordering new rules to track and monitor such devices. we he have fox team coverage. jennifer griffin at the pentagon on more on what the defense department knows and does not know about what is in the skies. first up, white house correspondent jacqui heinrich with the president s message. good evening, jacqui. hey, good evening, mike. president biden revealed the three objects shot down since friday were most likely tied to private companies or research institutions. but he defended his choice to blast them out of the sky following chinese spy balloon. i gave the order to take down these three objects due to hazard to civilian commercial air traffic and because we could not rule out the surveillance risk of sensitive facilities. critics watching the president s remarks say he missed a golden opportunity to drive home the threat about china s spy program. in the last several weeks. i have been informed this is a program that our country has kno
here. take a look at the misery map, more miserable virtually by the moment. john: you have to love the misery map. america reports rolls into a second hour. i m john roberts, good day to you again. gillian: no misery here, all good, all happy, not complaining about anything for a change. john: might be misery for you, but not gillian: i m gillian turner in for sandra smith, we ll take you live to the snow zone but first overseas. john: president biden jetting back to washington and leaving behind a new axis of evil. china and russia showcasing their close ties with iran in tow. gillian: declaring a no limits partnership, experts say not only a threat to ukraine but the future of taiwan as well. john: when chinese president xi jinping makes a trip to moscow in the spring. china says they plan to play peacemaker but they doubt intentions. they are working together today to reach those goals. john: where do we stand against our adversaries? we will take th
inside an open air drug market to expose what is ravaging our cities and how front line workers are fighting it. sandra: that s all new as america reports heads into a second hour. sandra smith in new york, great to be with you, john. john: good to be with you as well, and it s friday eve. john roberts in washington, begin with the fox news alert. people need to be conscious of the rules regarding classified information and appropriate handling of the, the rules are there for a reason. sandra: that was the fbi director sounding off as classified documents contestants add up in washington. the president facing growing backlash over his mishandling of records. he is expected to take to the podium in virginia a short time from now, to tout the economy. one of the wealthyest counties, by the way, he will be speaking in. john: we expect a lot of the speech will attack republicans economic agenda. no surprise there. sandra: the president s speech will focus on partisa
look forward to working closely with spain going forward. james in the back. i m sorry ok. i have a question, thank you. wait, wait, wait, you don t have a question, james? are you kidding me? are you kidding me? can we just have this for the record you didn t have a question. i m going to frame that transcript. simply a tribute to your loclasity and el if russia strikes nato, poland or the baltics, nato, do you have enough troops in the region right now to respond, and from day one, not five months ahead, and the second question would be many of those who called for sending leonards and abrams to ukraine argued that russia right now is too weakened to militarily too weakened to respond conventionally in a significant way. how confident are you in this assessment that russia is so weak, or maybe you have a different assessment, but many people think russia is too weak to respond in a significant way to the move that was just announced about tanks? le