may be the wrong color and wait in line. this is regression, an evil ideology, it is cruel and mean-spiritted. griff: crime surges nationwide, president biden is planning to take executive action on police reform after congress failed to make a deal on the legislation biden promised to progressives. carley. carley: fox news alert, the white house believes russian invasion of ukraine could be eminent. russian troops are stationed along the border. listen here. press sect. psaki: let s be clear, our view, this is an extremely dangerous situation, russia could launch an attack in ukraine. carley: secretary of state blinken landed in kiev to meet with the president and foreign minister today. it will talk about territorial integrity and will meet russian foreign
have you met with parkland survivors? i met with survivors at the white house. yes or no? you have met with survivors of school violence. i think i met with the parkland families. yes. do you have a responsibility in a climate of threats and violence taking place at schools, do you have a responsibility to convene strategy meetings to try to make sure we do not have eruptions of violence in the country, is that responsibility of the federal government? yes, our job is to protect americans. did you specifically say anything in this letter that can be seen as harassing moms and dads and parents or did you explicitly say that the constitution protects spirited debate? i specifically said
bridge as a teenager, to know i had to put extra time because i was being pulled over by law enforcement. if someone was to read the actual letter, you are literally saying as a leader of the highest law enforcement office in the land, that you protect spirited debate, that you think, though, given the climate of school violence in america, i met with victims from parkland, mr. president, i m sorry, i have watched republican after republican go over time and i know you re gently banging that gavel, i watched all today. my colleagues violate what you said was a strict time limit and i would ask you to afford me two more minutes. is there objection? no objection.
constitution protects spirited debate and i don t think anything in this letter could be read to intimidate mothers and fathers. and i m not talking about the outrage machine that fuels politics on both sides. i m talking about the actual letter here, sir, that you wrote. you re a good-hearted person, is there anything in this letter that could specifically lead a good-hearted parent who is against mask mandates, who somehow believes that the teaching of racial discrimination is repugnant to them, is there anything in this letter prevent them from going and speaking to it and yelling and being upset and letting elected officials know, anything in the print of this letter that could be lead to that type of intimidation? no, senator, those things are protected by the constitution. say that one more thing. all those things are protected by the constitution. i hope you will do your law
domestic groups. has there been a long, pages long list of what my staff can grab, threats and violence against school officials in the united states of america in the last year? i haven t seen the list, but it accords with my recollection. the letter that i heard so much about that i pulled it to read it. you say literally, threat spiritted debate about policy matters is protected under the constitution. i m quoting a colleague today, does that sound like harassing and intimidating moms and dads? you affirm that spiritted debate is allowed. while spiritted debate about policy matters is protected under the constitution. that protection does not extend to threats and violence that we ve been watching on our tv screens.