evidence at court, that many of the statements denied that they were ever traffic for ready trial. none of them had ever been trafficked. during the investigation mr ramzan was arrested. he had never really met the defendant, had nothing to do with trafficking, had never been alone in a room with errors let alone in a room with errors let alone had sex with her. he described in court is utter consternation at being publicly arrested on the promenades and questioned by the police. i will set out more of the impact of this offending upon him and his family later in his remarks. the defendant set about seeking to back up allegations against mr ramzan and the fictitious traffickers. she did so in a number of ways. i will summarise here only some of them. she manipulated people with whom she was in contact via snapchat to contact her. she would rename these people in her phone with the names of supposed traffickers. she would induce sexual messages from them and take screenshots o
repremisrepresented their histo, and both those cases the judges in washington, d.c., refused to reconsider the verdict. so this is a very important stage to try to filter out these types of jurors. sandra: that being said on the case itself and where this all goes, jonathan, this is andrew joo caskey on anr this morning on newsroom on the high burden of proof of the prosecutors in this case, jonathan, let s listen together. there are two players of special intent of the prosecutors have to establish in order to convict to donald trump and that is a very difficult thing to do. it s even more difficult when they don t have direct evidence of a-determiner. donald trump expected to testify, he said he is going to do that, certainly he will deny his own mental intent here. sandra: do you agree with all that, jonathan? jonathan: it is certainly true the problem with the intent here is there are lots of reasons why you would want to
people will have noticed is, hang on a minute, it is on the left and he is looking to the right, rather than the late queen s image was always on the late queen s image was always on the right looking to the left. firstly, nobody should be alarmed! there is no special intent. we always face the monarch into the stamp, if that makes sense, but depending on the design the image may be on the right or the left, so the image has been designed so it can be swapped. 50 it the image has been designed so it can be swapped- can be swapped. so it is not like the coins were can be swapped. so it is not like the coins were by can be swapped. so it is not like the coins were by tradition, - can be swapped. so it is not like the coins were by tradition, the | the coins were by tradition, the coins is always flecked? i wondered if it was that, but it is not. tt is if it was that, but it is not. it is not with stamps. if it was that, but it is not. it is not with stamps. in if it was that, bu
physical or the biological destruction of that group. so it s not just, you know, destroying as a cultural group or as a cultural entity. it s actually achieving the physical of the biological dysfunction. and that s quite a high standard to establish. and of course because this is talking about a state of mind, it s a special intent, as you called it. you have to show that those who are involved in this activity, that they have this state of mind. so you either establish that by what they say or you establish that by inference from what they have done. and that s often not easy to do. now you and other legal experts have prepared a special legal tribunal to prosecute times of aggression, which is use of armed force by a state against a sovereign integrity or political independence of