accountable. new york times with this, quote within hours of a jury finding mr. trump guilty last week, the anger conyield into demands for action. since then, the prominent gop leaders have demanded they use every instrument of power again democrats, included targeted investigations and prosecutors. here step miller puts it is every house committee controlled by republicans? in every way, it needs to right now with every republican d.a. to start is every donor off the sidelines and in the game, the rich guys, the wealthy guys? everything facet of republican party politics and power has to be used right-to-now to go toe to toe with marxism and beat these why do you have to talk to jesse waters that way? maybe he knows. i don t know. echoes miller s tirade, trump s comrades in arms in the january 6th bannon said in a text message to the times on tuesday that now is the moment for obscure republican prosecutors around the country to make a name for themselves by pro
Political. how much of what is already in the water how much is that seeded already through the eight years of trump prosecuting hillary and enemies? i don t know, but if you play it out, you have this true showdown on the judicial branch. like we have seen the judicial branch get tested, but it would be a whole different thing about how you deal with one of these prosecutions. if they were actually able to come up with it and do it. i think that trump his obsession with this issue, was he under investigation and who was going to be investigated? i think because he understood the speccer of investigation, and that is the idea that when someone is under investigation, new york times or whoever writes a story that said this person is being investigated, and there are stories, stories, stories that tie them to criminality as an investigation goes on, and it casts a cloud.
And who are good in terms of presenting a case, that s the first thing that has to be in the mind of the speccer. so the evidence can be presented well and that the senators can understand what we found. do you think he would be a good choice, amosh? i don t know. i don t know. i do think probably the best person to lead this would be adam schiff, since he has complete command of the facts. he is a former u.s. attorney. so he has good trial skills. you know, as i understand, there are dozens of other members of congress on the democratic side who have asked to be managers. i m not among them, i ll tell you. so, the speaker will have a tough choice to make. but i would assume that she will go with people who have command of the facts. justin is not on either committee. so, that would be kind of an
he was writing memos according to the new york times story that were advising her on the security situation on the ground at the same time as he had a business a financial interest, in the in companies looking to get in on the reconstruction of libya. obviously that presents a possibility of a blatant conflict of interest. now she and her allies say this is im, it s not us, and it s unclear we should be clear what she knew about his business interest. nonetheless it continues to raise the speccer of a blurring of the line of conflict of interest that she needs to answer to. another reason why we like to hear from her on this and a lot of other issues. ken and kristin thank you both. we ll have more from iowa as hillary clinton gets ready for for her second event in two days. a developing weather alert in texas and the plains states where flash flood warnings and watches are in effect. flash floods turned deadly in
That s the dynamic we are talking about here. i think it s interesting to watch richard sherman as a public figure and athlete take back control of being at the center of this insane kind of media circus he was in the wake of that interview. we did a segment. it was on talk radio, the local news, there is this guy, meet richard sherman, he s a plaque man with dreads. he is yelling at you in the camera. this is how you should think about i him. he takes the mic right back. for the, no, no, this is how you should talk about me. i think it s a delicious irony, he gets to the press conference, he is incredibly articulate critiquing what is said about him and why. i think it s important to remember, it was not him simply being excited, it was excited in such close proximity to erin andrew, he wasn t yelling at her, he was yelling about another player. maybe this is the age old speccer of a black man being threatening to a white woman.