Hello, i am katty kay in washington, Christian Fraser is in london. Brits go to the polls in just over 2a hours and an election that was all about brexit has suddenly veered into security and policing in the wake of manchester and london. Today third attacker was named as rachid redouane. Reports in the Italian Press suggest he tried to travel to syria last year, but was stopped by italian police. Uk Officials Say Youssef Zaghba was not on their watch list. Authorities in the uk are reviewing their intelligence. So are we doing enough . One man who thinks authorities are going about it in the wrong way is nazir afzal. Up until 10 days ago he was the Chief Executive of the association of police and crime commissioners. He was stopped from speaking after the Manchester Attack and so he resigned so he could have his say. He is in our salford studio. Do you think muslim communities in your view are taking enough ownership of this problem . Obviously theyre doing as much as they can, but th
former attorney right now, her former attorney from speaking to federal investigators. at some point it s going to have to happen. the question is when is that day going to be. as far as michael avenatti and his relationship to this probe, it would almost seem like a strange day if he didn t appear on tv and have some built of new information or some comment on what s happening. he did have some new information, unconfirmed today about potentially phone conversations taped between michael cohen and the president. . for that reason, that s why he s a problem for the prosecuters in new york. he does not allow for the protection of michael cohen to have a fair trial if he had one in the future. you ll have a tainted jury pool. you ll have somebody leaking information to the public and somebody who has a right to a court of public opinion hearing. big picture? what s fascinating about michael avenatti is one of the few people who has managed to
or law enforcement sources or somebody leaking information about the manchester investigation. then there s the president disclosing information to the russians in the oval office. you are right. those are two separate types of leaks of information. i m not saying that either one is a good thing. we do need to make sure we keep them separate. you have some i would suspect lower level law enforcement officials putting out information to the press about this ongoing investigation which could put the investigation at risk. maybe even potentially put lives at risk as they are trying to prosecute the conspirators of this bombing. you have the president releasing in a very unscripted, unregulated way apparently very sensitive intelligence shared with us by another nation. then later announcing to the world what nation that was. that could have a chilling affect on intelligence agencies around the world in terms of their decisions to help share and continue to share information with us go
peninsula and calling kim jong-un a mad man. it may seem surprising to the public but this isn t an issue. an element of our diplomacy is to reassure allies by telling them help is nearby. in that particular case he had a diplomatic message he was sending. he wasn t giving away the coordinates of the submarine. they re not that easy to find. given all that, what does it say if anything about how this president does business and how much a break is this from the way other presidents have operated? joining us is retired navy rear admiral john kirby who had an up close view as a naval officer. also with us one of president reagan s lieutenants if not admirals, jeffrey lord is joining us. there s two issues here. they shouldn t be u.s. intelligence sources or law enforcement sources or somebody leaking information about the