if you supply all this money in a tight economy, it s going to create more inflation. mr. speaker, when i served at that time four years later we became the majority. i had the honor and privilege, my conference elected me majority whip and majority leader. and i will know the frustration i had to. shannon: our capitol hill correspondent is standing by tonight to dig into the numbers, we ll do that in just a minute. president biden getting the lowest marks yet and i fox news poll, voters say he s focused on all the wrong things. our political panel will weigh in and in jurors head into day for deliberations and the kyle rittenhouse trial, a reporter is on the ground in kenosha, wisconsin, tonight. what these continuing deliberations might mean for a final verdict. we begin on a very long night on capitol hill, his three hour plus speech blasting democrats and congressional correspondent chad pergram is tracking all the developments for us, he is with us live to explain wh
these people were definitely trying to murder kyle rittenhouse.es so rittenhouse s response to that was the definition of self-defense. desperate split second decisions made in the face of unwanted aggression in an attempt to save his own life. that s what happened every person who testified on both sides of the trial confirmed that. no honest person doubts it kyle rittenhouse never should have been charged in the first place. yet, he was. the reason he was is very simple from. this the beginning this case was driven by politics and ever since it s been tainted by government deception and incompetence. for example, we re just learning now relevant new evidence in the case. really? this is evidence a jury should have seen before it began deliberation, obviously, on the basis of all known facts. needless to say this is not how our legal system is supposed to work. this is what we learned. one of the charges kyle rittenhouse faces is a felonyy count for recklessly safety of a ma
That it s a try to get the judge to help break things up. sometimes you will see a question like you know, if we find x, should we do y? and it sometimes reflects just an impasse in the jury. or they can actually send out and this could happen tomorrow, a notice that they are dead locked. they can say we reached agreements on three counts but not the others. every judge that i know will send them back to deliberate. tucker: right. they never accept that first deadlock. they just say you all have to just try harder. interestingly enough, they often do reach they often do break through the deadlock when they get that but we can look for those things, but i don t think you can tell i m hearing aon lot of people say well this is clearly now a hung jury orpl they this is clearly a pro-prosecution jury. i don t think you can really say that. tucker: i m confused, as a nonlawyer, by how the prosecution was allowed to withhold the identity of one of the pivotal figures in the case,
Crumbling city there are a ton of nice people. i actually don t recognize the descriptions of the country that i hear so very often, that it s deeply rotted on or it s terrible afternoon we need burn it all down and build back better. no, we don t actually, it ss already pretty great. in fact, it s the best expression [cheers and applause] this country is the best expression of human decency in the history of the world. and if you don t believe that s true, tell me what is. tucker: boy, can i go on. that s why i m a talk show host me yapping was not the highlight of the night the patriot awards, the people being honored, people in the crowd, great people, really great people. watch the whole thing on fox nation or go to tuckercarlson.com. so, the qanon shaman,
From the state crime lab in this situation has been provided to us via dropbox. dropbox provides an exact forensic copy of what they have. the file title name in this situation should have been exactly the same as the one provided to the state. if it was the exact same copy. the file name was nowhere near similar. tucker: so how to account for this? well, the prosecutors explained they just got this footage in the last minute a few days ago.s they said they immediately sent it to the defense and they had no idea the defense would get such a low quality copy of it a technical glitch, they said. that doesn t make sense, actually and the judge seemed to understand that. he asked why the prosecution waited more than a year to get this footage.is the defendant s first attorney after he was charged with this case appeared on an interview, appeared alongside the high definition version of this footage.