Everyone, i am laura ingraham, and this is the The Ingraham Angle from washington tonight. China and the fanatics, this is the angle tonight. I wonder whaabt thoue leaders oe Chinese Party think about the theopagebate in United States . After brilliantly deploying propaganda and spying operation inside the u. S. , they must be pleasantly surprised to see bipartisan support to help them protect it. Yes, justrm, like averyst social media platform there isie Privacy Concerns and it is goi important we dont treat tiktok different than other platforms. If we address this issue, we have to take the same approach o see some Media Platforms. We cant just go out one periods be when we most certainly can and should. I when our National Security and t our Election Integrity is at stake, we must act to protect our country. Ensi for decades we are trying to c hiprevent this transfer of technology to our adversaries in china, iran, north korea, russia, so on. It is so bad with china that all g7 Fore
Thats the focus of tonights angle. I wonder what the leaders of the Chinese Communist parties think about the tiktok debate in the United States. After brilliantly deploying a propaganda and spying operation inside the u. S. , they must be pleasantly surprised to see bipartisan support to help them protect it. Yes. Just like every other social media platform, there is misinformation and privacy concerns. Its important that we dont treat tiktok differently than other platforms. If were going to address this issue, we have got to take the same approach to other media platforms. We cant just single out one. Laura we most certainly can and should. When our National Security in our Election Integrity is at stake, we must act to protect our country. Now, for decades, we have been trying to prevent the transfer of sensitive u. S. Technology to our adversaries in china, in iran, north korea, russia, and so on. And its so bad with china that all g7 Foreign Ministers pledge actions to counter ch
there s going to be money going somewhere. if that s coupled with smart legislation, with better training, with more regulations, does that work? here is the problem. this is what i point out in my piece. you make an interesting distinction. smart legislation. the fact that we refuse by law, refuse to allow the collection of data and to fund the study of gun violence in america like we do every other health crisis in america means we can never really produce smart legislation. we are doing it in an information vacuum. let me ask you, because this goes back to the dickey amendment of 1996. he changed course and said we should be looking at this like we look at traffic violations. absolutely. there are republicans stepping forward. brian mass in florida wrote in your paper saying he s not afraid of becoming a political casualty here. he s been a member of the nra since he was a child. is there enough movement now on the other side?