Latest Breaking News On - Slam dunk charges - Page 1 : comparemela.com
issue, only this time her answer was different. she said that she had been asked the question a million times and the answer, quote, remains the same. but, in fact, the first time, instead of saying the president had never spoken to hunter about his business dealings, she said this. the president was never in business with his son. so on wednesday, phil wegman from real clear politics pointed out the inconsistency, but john pierr pierre insisted it was the same. i just want to clear this up once for all. the president has said he s never discussed overseas business dealings with his son, but the white house now says that the president has never been in business with his son. so why the updated language? which statement is true? or is it semantics and they are both true? as i stated on monday, when i was asked this question multiple times, nothing has changed. nothing has changed. nothing has changed on this. and so you can ask me a million different ways on this quest
ItEquivalentEarthquakeConcert-sound-systemCombinationSwift-fans-dancingSeismologists700002-3SyncGround-vibrationsMichael-smerconish smerconish in philadelphia. in september of 2019, joe biden was asked how many$#ursqj he ha spoken to son hunter about his overseas business activities. the then candidate s answer a was this. i have never spoken to my son about that. that has remained his answer until this week. on monday white house press secretary was asked about this issue, only this time her answer was different. she said that she had been asked the question a million times and the answer remains the same. but in fact the first time instead of saying the president had never spoken to hunter about his business dealings, she said this. the president was never in business with his son. so on wednesday, phil wegman pointed out the insistent sit, but she insisted the answer was the same. i just want to clear this up once if and are all. the president has said he s never discussed overseas business dealings with his son, but the white house now says that the president has never been in business with
Michael-smerconishAnswerSonJoe-bidenBusinessSon-hunterPhiladelphiaActivitiesCandidateSeptember-of-20192019QuestionInequitable treatment of taxpayers. like we stated before, the signed prosecutor, which included doj tax attorneys, all agreed to recommend the approval for the felony and misdemeanor charges they called them slam dunk charges. in your op-ed, you characterized the doj s behavior as obstruction. here s my question. do you think that there was concerted action, activity here by individuals in doj, maybe in the irs, concerted activity not to pursue the case aggressively, or more benignly perhaps, they are just afraid of rattling the cage of a high-profile family and defendants? the reason for me coming forward is this is all about preferential treatment of one person, and we re not treating taxpayers the same. so i guess i would point to the facts. the fact are that we re not
TreatmentMisdemeanorFelonyProsecutorDojTaxpayersSlam-dunk-chargesTax-attorneysApprovalQuestionActivityObstructionZeigler, one of the agents who blew the whistle on the handling of this case. he published this opinion piece titled a special counsel for hunter biden. thank you so much for being here. what is it that the tax manual required that was not done in this case? i appreciate you so much for having me. so in the tax manual, i pointed this out, that if you have a felony charge, if you have the evidence for the felony, and you also have the evidence for the misdemeanor, it s departmental policy that you have to charge the felony. the reason for that is inequitable treatment of taxpayers. like we stated before, the signed prosecutors, which included doj tax attorneys, all agreed to recommend the approval for the felony and misdemeanor charges. they actually called them slam dunk charges. in your op-ed, you characterized the doj s behavior as obstruction. here s my question.
CaseOneTaxHunter-bidenAgentsWhistleHandlingSpecial-counselOpinion-pieceEvidenceFelonyOut