right? like there is a per miss sieveness against white violence and black people regard wills of the victim of any white instance of violence, black people know overall white people aren t with guns patrolling the streets being able to shoot whatever they want to doesn t work out well for us. so there is a concern about justice and fairness and there is some self-preservation, there is i know that doesn t work out for me. the people that can t see that are like people who are chewing on rosemary like a cow saying it tastes bitter. it s like you idiot, it s supposed to go in the soup. there is a whole soup of racism and if you only pull out one bit or another bit like you might
sieveness. in the end, the governor said she did what she had to do. after weighing all of the arguments, i have vetoed senate bill 1062 moments ago. reporter: it was the news so many had hoped to hear. i am absolutely thrilled. happiness. it s about time. i knew she was going to do it. reporter: arizona s governor vetoes the bill. i call them like i see them, despite the cheers or the boos from the crowd. reporter: the governor says the bill was broadly worded with the potential to create more problems than it could solve. i not heard of one example where business owner s religious liberty had been vie litted. reporter: the reaction as passionate as the days of
administration, in power? this is something more than they ever thought it would become? that is a great question, i don t know the answer, i mean, look, that he nobody has known how to react to the tea party from the beginning, remember, at the beginning of the tea party movement, everybody treated them with most people treated them with dismiss sieveness and snide references to the tea party and deriding them as a fringe group and we have seen the initial assessments were not only wrong but wrong in a significant way. and, we have seen the growth of the tea party movement, because part what they are argue and issues they are focused on are the issues that are driving voters, not just republicans, conservatives, democrats, independents, and, those are the issues people are concerned about and that is what the tea partiers are talking about and you have seen the political establishment in washington go from sort of dismissive toward the tea partiers, to curious about the tea part
the jury left without talking to reporters. i think they were very tired at the end of the day. they may relent in the next couple of days and choose a couple spokespeople but we don t know whether it was 11-1 to convict. 11-1 to aquit. 6-6, 8-4. that is a very important thing because the way the jury came down on the counts has a lot to do with the per space sieveness of each side s case and let me point out one thing that i have to add as someone who runs a better government group even though i spent all those years as a political reporter, this trial defense was paid with by rod blagojevich s campaign fund, about $3 million. he is now broke. their family is $200,000 in debt. trial number two and any subsequent appeals are going to be paid for by illinois taxpayers. we re talking about several million tax dollars for a state that is one of the most broke in the nation and whether or not justice is served with the miggs trial and the second trial, i can t imagine a single illinois