justices a fifth to 15 week ban versus an all out overturning of roe, i mean, what does that make any sense to you if that in cases in the event is happening? you know, i think the i don ter know if there was a leak there,k but i don t think you would need a leak to come to the conclusion that the wall street journal did because anyone who watched those arguments could hear the chief justice was just desperate to overturn or too uphold the ban but not overturn roe. and we all knowot that s not legally possible.ss even both sidesib ofle. the argt are said no, no, i m sorry, yous can t do that like and you re seeing now he s being attackedta and his address tock be given ot is one of the people who would overturn roe even though it s clear he s going to be trying to do that was trying to lobbyg those justices. that wouldn t surprise me. that wouldn t surprise me knowing the things the chief has done in the t past, does that mean that they were likely to haveik switched? arguments i mean,