security and interest of other countries, the diversity of their civilizational and cultural historical patterns and treat the peaceful development of other states objectively and fairly. xi and putin saying that where one is holding an olympics, where he is being boycotted by at least seven countries, diplomatally because of his treatment of the uighurs, and putin on the verge of attempting to bully and influence and potentially even invade again ukraine. so you talk about the hypocrisy of those two things. i d also like to comment on what robin said because i think she s spot on. when she said they have each other s back, that s probably the best way to view their relationship. it isn t a partnership, a side by side partnership. i would almost say that they re back-to-back looking at different opportunities around the world to expand their horizons and their territory. both of them have stated that
identifiology vision of bannon much criticized has been a big part of shaping the message. now they have to be partners at a time when typically you would have much more of a pyramid structure in this white house. that we don t have. so there are conversations we have with various advisers, people who are working closely or inside talking about who is the ultimate boss, who has the president s ear? so there is a tension that has existed because of the structure and because of the pathways they each had into this white house and the various responsibilities. so by appearing together, that is intended to sort of show a side by side partnership. and they have spoken out vigorously against this notion that they are somehow not getting along. and they, too, are really the only ones who know. but it is sometimes hard for people who work for them to determine who is the boss. tom, inside we have this conservative pep rally of sorts, if you will.