return with a response. our security correspondent frank gardner has more, from jerusalem. what s being debated is the permission by the israeli military for large numbers of palestinian displaced people, currently who are sheltering in the south of the gaza strip, in the city of rafah, to move back to their homes in the north. that s something that israel has resisted in the past. israel, reportedly, would also remove some of its forces from gaza. this would be during a a0 day truce. and there would of course be the exchange of hostages and prisoners. probably hundreds, if not thousands, of palestinian prisoners coming out of israeli jails in return for a rather lowerfigure than was originally demanded by israel an initialfigure of around 33 israeli hostages. now, from the israeli side, there is dual pressure going on here. pressure from the united states to do this deal, and pressure domestically from all the families and friends of the hostages who ve been demonstrating
under this proposal the israeli media has put the figure at 33 in return for the release of an unspecified number of palestinian prisoners. us presidentjoe biden has been speaking with the leaders of egypt and qatar who have been mediators. the us secretary of state, antony blinken, who is in saudi arabia, said he is hopeful hamas will accept what he described as a very generous proposal. hamas has before it a proposal that is extraordinarily, extraordinarily generous on the part of israel and in this moment, the only thing standing between the people of gaza and a ceasefire is hamas. they have to decide and they have to decide quickly. with me is mohamed taha from bbc arabic. how close are we to a breakthrough? the information from cairo shows every party looks like very close. there is a massive amount of taxability from each side but this flexibility is coming with lots of complexities and challenges. i will give you a brief about the challenges if you may allow me from
called anchoring it s more of a spending cap, and could come in the season after next. here s our sports editor dan roan with more from one of the club s opposing the possible introduction, manchester united. the current system known as the profit and sustainability regulations has been very controversial because everton and nottingham forest have fallen foul of it and been docked points for breaching a rule that restricts losses over her three year period and some of some comps have been pushing for a new system which would effectively mean a hard salary cap known as anchoring. it would see clubs allowed spending on new players and wages limited to a multiple of the amount of money earned by the amount of money earned by the lowest placed club in television revenue. those clubs believe that this would bill mean a fairer premier league and a more competitive balance at a time when the likes of manchester city have secured a sixth title in seven seasons. at other clubs suc
return with a response, though there is no indication of a timeline. frank gardner has more, from jerusalem. what s been being debated is the permission by the israeli military for large numbers of palestinian displaced people, currently who are sheltering in the south of the gaza strip, in the south of the gaza strip, in the city of rafah, to move back to their homes in the north. that is something israel has resisted in the past. israel, reportedly, would also remove some of its forces from gaza. this would be during the a0 day truce. and they would of course be the exchange of hostages and prisoners. probably hundreds if not thousands of palestinian prisoners coming out of israeli jails in return from a rather lower figure that was originally lowerfigure that was originally demanded by israel, an initialfigure of around 33 israeli hostages. now, from the israeli hostages. now, from the israeli side, there is a dual pressure going on here. pressure from the united states