shooting rosenbaum, it begs the question why did you charge first degree reckless homicide. i don t think there s any conclusion aside from the fact that they didn t have a clear view of what happened. it seemed like that part fact pattern they were reevaluated as they went along. that s specific to the trial to hear questions with regard to gun laws. at some point you re going to have to ask the question, what does it mean to have open carry and stand your ground laws under circumstances where people are going to be taking guns into volatile situations? when i look at this, i think of the movie tombstone . even in the movie about the wild west, they understood you can own a gun, carry a gun, you can t carry your gun in town. and basically they were saying, under situations where emotions are going to be high, you might want to back off having a weapon in that situation, because when things are getting heated, and rittenhouse put his gun in the back of a trunk, two people would be ali