what? when there was criticism from the obama administration of the united states, did jt you say they were blaming america first? look, all i m saying is he is saying fact. america is still the city on a shining hill. have we made mistakes, yes. are we morally equivalent, no. he never said that. what he did do, anna, when asked basically to condemn vladimir putin i think that s where o reilly was going, he s a killer, you seem to be deferential to him. why? he chose instead to levy similar criticism levied against putin on the united states. he s been doing it over and over again. donald trump has been consistent on anything, it has been on protecting, sheltering, commending putin throughout the campaign and now since being president-elect and being president. i would say to the leaders in my party who are offended, outraged by this equivalency, by these
And yes, we can, and the great presidents, and if you ask who are the greatest modern president presidents, i people named fdr, and new deal, and nothing new to fear, and shining hill, and new destiny, and ronald reagan, and that is why we are here, and the bill clinton, don t stop thinking about tomorrow, and so that is the way to pull yourself out of this pack, too. trump to his credit has both sides of the equation. america s in decline, and we are in terrible shape and get angry about it, and he has the other side, let s make america great again. and he is giving a speech out here in california aboard the u.s.s. iowa which is a museum, and on national policy, and it is a type of speech to have a teleprompter to read or the script or go out as he does with all of the speeches and simply wing it? i know that people have
we care more when it s in ourself interest to care. right and to use a phrase that i think craig night have run across once or twice, we are a city on a shining hill. fen e when you think of that image, these are people out there, looking up, aspiring, not necessarily that we are going in, saving them. craig, before we leave, we bought the to, mark a moment in the development of the republican party. you and i have been on one side, not in this durnt conflict. on one side of the republican party, there have been more non-interventionists. the republican party moved far away. yes. from where we were in the 1980s, under reagan, where we were in the 1950s under ike, where we were in the 1990s, even. right. it s safe to say the neocons are on the run. this last crisis have shown they are at lowest until another republican president is sworn in, they re in the overwhelming minority republican party.