thank you so much for letting us into your homes during these extraordinary times. we are grateful. the beat with ari melber starts right now welcome back. good to be back thank you. welcome to the beat. we have breaking news right now in the prosecution of donald trump in new york. we are tracking a brand new legal filing from the manhattan d.a., a name that many across america know since donald trump was arraigned, d.a. alvin bragg. and it s related to this new case, new york versus donald trump. it s out late today and we have the filing i m going to get into these two pieces of it this is what the filing looks like, and this is what it looks like when the former president threatens the d.a., creating criminal evidence, which we re seeing put in more than one case this is brand new. didn t know it was coming. what we have is an aggressive move here by this d.a. to protect the legal jurisdiction to stay on offense in new york on the prosecution of donald trump for s
visiting hurricane damage regions, there are no paper towel rolls being tossed as the 11th hour gets underway on this monday night. good evening once again, i m stephanie ruhle, and a case against the former handling of white house documents appears to be growing by the day. tonight, reporting from the washington post and the new york times, seems to provide the justice department more potential evidence. both papers reporting the back in february, one of trump s lawyers refused his clients request to tell the national archives that everything had been returned. the post returns this. the lawyer declined because, he was not sure the statement was true, according to people familiar with the matter. the paper reports that that lawyer was alex cannon, who is responsible for the transfer of 15 boxes of presidential records, from mar-a-lago to the national archives back in january. he is the very same alex cannon who testified to the january 6th committee, that he told white house
against the former handling of white house documents appears to be growing by the day. tonight, reporting from the washington post and the new york times, seems to provide the justice department more potential evidence. both papers reporting the back in february, one of trump s lawyers refused his clients request to tell the national archives that everything had been returned. the post returns this. the lawyer declined because, he was not sure the statement was true, according to people familiar with the matter. the paper reports that that lawyer was alex cannon, who is responsible for the transfer of 15 boxes of presidential records, from mar-a-lago to the national archives back in january. he is the very same alex cannon who testified to the january 6th committee, that he told white house chief of staff mark meadows, that there was no evidence of voter fraud in 2020 election. the papers say that both trump and cannon have yet to respond to specific questions about this docu
Write legislation in tennessee instead of the people we represent some we are fighting this anti-democratic behavior in this legislation, legislating of inequity in tennessee. right, and i think it s important you lay that out people can hear that there could be good faith disagreements about tradeoffs in policy, gun safety, but the result was undercut the voters, undercut democracy, which has been a rising problem on the right. we have a little bit of one republican talking about this. it was an insurrection. what they did was at least equivalent, maybe worse depending on how you look at it of doing an insurrection in the capitol. that s a reference to the protests you ll get the benefit of responding but just as i was doing earlier in the program, i ll do a fact check for viewers as this is the news. the sedition on january 6th was a tried and convicted, so legally it was a convicted sedition, and we all know how
He is not currently a declared candidate for president. he says you re like the answer you here when i say it. if we were to actually make that declaration, a lot of those funding those we go into effect, he will be restricted on what the pack could spend. but as for now, he can spend it as he wants. stunning, katie, oath keepers trial is now underway, how high are the stakes? the stakes are very high, these are the most serious charges brought against any of the 900 to so defendants that the justice department is filed criminal charges against. it s asking the jury to decide whether or not the leader of the oath keepers, and several other members, whether or not they committed sedition on january 6th, whether or not they planned to over the throw the government, by stopping the peaceful transfer of power from president trump to joe biden. this is going to be a really important case, legal experts have already said that coming into the capitol, instead