treatment and care. people less likely to survive will not get those resources. they will be moved down the line. instead, in an effort to save as many human lives as possible, these hospitals now have permission and guidance to prioritize giving treatment to people who are more likely to live. and that is as bad as it sounds. it means that some people will not be admitted to the hospital, even though they need to be hospitalized. other people who might previously have been given curative treatment, treatment to cure them and save them instead will just be given comfort care to try to make things easier for them. and it s a sort of anti-dine phrase, crisis standards of care. but it is a terrible thing, and it is a thing that we really haven t confronted before as a country. now we ve got it in place, though, in one of montana s major medical centers. they moved to crisis standards of care this week. we ve also got it in every hospital in the state in idaho as of last week, an
hospital started crisis standard of care before the whole state sees tonight. and groups news reporting a triage team. using a specific formula to prioritize patients most likely to recover. has been asked to help with patient care decision, one decision we there were four patients were required a special kind of dialysis which was a replacement therapy. for patients but only two of the four could get it of the two patients who did not receive the therapy, one of them died. the other one survived but remains hospitalized now in a politics care care we setting. another decision at the hospital involve deciding which patient got incubated because they were not enough beds in the icu. another patient died in a world alaska hospital because they needed cardiac catheterization. they were quote waiting for a bid to free up so we could transfer them said the hospital chief steph. and that patient died. providence alaska, the hospital that previously set of crisis tentative care th
previously have been given curative treatment, treatment to cure them and save them instead will just be given comfort care to try to make things easier for them. and it s a sort of anodyne phrase, crisis standards of care. but it is a terrible thing, and it is a thing that we really haven t confronted before as a country. now we ve got it in place, though, in one of montana s major medical centers. they moved to crisis standards of care this week. we ve also got it in every hospital in the state in idaho as of last week and in every hospital in the state in alaska as of tonight. and all of this, of course, is because of the huge influx of very sick covid patients, swamping and effectively breaking the hospital systems in these states so that they can no longer provide care along the ethical and sort of technical guidelines that they ve always followed. and it s not just covid patients who are going to suffer from this rationing in these hospitals. it means everybody who need
former president trump, but reveals a new element in his far-reaching attempt to overturn biden s victory. and chairman, bennie thompson, said the panel has spoken with bill barr. we have had conversations with the former attorney general already. we talked to the department of defense individuals. we are concerned that our military was part of this big lie on promoting that the election was false. so if you are using the military to potentially seize voting machines even though it s a discussion, the public needs to know. there s bill barr, and then the question to hear from ivanka trump. you will remember, the president s daughter served as a white house adviser, putting her within the epicenter of power, making her a public servant who answers to the american people who can be scrutinized and held accountable through congressional oversight. ivanka is not just donald s daughter, but she was a senior adviser, and so could you imagine if, in fact, merrick garland final
as i was saying about pramila jayapal, this is just a continuation of last night s discussion. okay. as you know. at exactly this moment last night. she was on your show. full of optimism in the face of your pessimism, which is my favorite segment on the rachel maddow show and you just reported where the optimism stands tonight but the point that i didn t get to last night that i really want to get to is i think she is the she should lecture the rest of the house about how to speak publicly about pending legislation. sure, you might be angry at another democrat or another person who might or might not vote for the bill, but expressing that anger publicly at those people is the most unproductive thing you can do as long as the legislation is still pending. the diplomatic way that she talks about joe manchin publicly is what allows her to talk to him privately. which none of the democrats who kind of popped out angrily about joe manchin sunday and monday are able to d