entered the, building destroyed popular guy, etc, because they believe that donald trump wanted them to. this is an idea that has been brought up by people who have been charged. keep in mind, attorney general garland, the justice department hasn t ruled out the investigations of her anybody. they re willing to investigate people, even those who did not enter the capitol on that day. the departments already made good on that, by charging the head of the oath keepers with sedition. mr. rhodes, very notably, did not actually enter the capitol, he did not illegally enter, or try to stop congress that day, but if you look at the charging documents, it says he was a key player and the mastermind behind the attack. harry, in terms of the individual speed of the day. i think katie s correct say the odds of their cooperation are pretty low, we ll see what
happens. how teasing this plays out? they are low, but they have a lot to lose, more than the average person. if they are held in contempt, and it is sustained, it is really curtains for them. i also want to second will katie said, just to say very roughly, both january 6th and doj are about trying to align what we now know as being seditious conspiracy cases, to the oval offices that will be marginal group that is a bridge from trump to these folks. fundraising, etc. sydney powell, among others, represented michael powell, and we re beginning to inch into the michael powell alex jones land. in any event, i think will come out talking, and it s not clear the committee really believes
in extreme times, in which the rule of law hasn t held. there isn t a possible mission structure of course, that s key to what we re seeing. i want to follow up to you, katie. this is reporting of a colleague of yours, not your writer for new york times. to the legal system. and at least one case, and in visual named brenda straka the prosecutors are said to have asked about trump s role of the january 6th riot. which seem significant, and maybe we have not seen that yet, in any of the charging documents. prosecutors wanted to know about any coordination with trump, or his followers. we haven t seen that in the charging documents. we have seen is people being charged by the justice department, saying that they did with a did, that they were at the capitol, illegally