hi, everyone. it s 4:00 in new york. president joe biden s sole surviving son hunter biden was convicted today on three felony counts related to possession of a gun while using narcotics. a delaware jury of his peers found hunter biden guilty of lying on a federal form while applying for a handgun, lying to a gun dealer and illegally possessing a firearm for 11 days in the year 2018. today s verdict marks the end of a painful chapter for the biden family with witness after witness detailing an incredibly troubled period in hunter biden s life, a time when he was addicted to crack cocaine, a time when he was in and out of rehab with a mountain of financial problems. several members of the biden family have attended court in support of hunter, including his sister, his wife and his mom, first lady dr. jill biden seen her walking out of court today with hunter after the verdict was read. hunter biden s defense had denied that hunter had deliberately lied about his drug use when
opportunity to stay the 10 rounds law and justice kennedy s opinion did not. so that is all we heard from the supreme court on that. they need to step up and clarify this for the nation. jillian: do you think they will? they turned away a lot of appeals that would answer these questions, justice thomas writing a dissent said they treat the second amendment like second-rate or second-tier constitutional right. it should be on par with all the rest of them. the supreme court has not taken up any case since heller in 2008, they need to, they have turned down a number of challenges recently and potentially changing membership on the supreme court may break the logjam in terms of getting these issues there over the next couple years. shannon: i will be back monday for opinions and any announcements justices like to
supreme court had the opportunity to stay the ten-rounds law and the opinion did not. that s all we heard from the united states supreme court on the ammunition. so finally, i think they need to step up and clarify this for the nation. quickly, do you think they will? because they ve turned away a lot of appeals. they re treating the second amendment like a second-rate or second-tier constitutional right. it should be on par with all the rest of them. that s right. the supreme court hasn t taken up any case since heller in 08 and one in 2010. i think if we re looking at potentially changing membership on the u.s. supreme court, that may break the law jam. we ll be standing by. all right, david and ken, thank you both very much.