has retained on much of the republican base. more republicans will be asking themselves if this is the person they want as their nominee in 2024. taken as a whole, it was devastating in the extreme and for the congressional committee tasked with investigating the most devastating attack on the u.s. capitol in centuries, hutchinson s testimony puts their probe at a crossroads with important new questions to answer, especially about the role of white house counsel pat cipollone and what he told the ex-presind top trump officials on january 6th and in the days before and after. vice chair liz cheney reiterating the panel s call for cipollone to testify. white house counsel pat cipollone had significant concerns. it s time for sip loan toe testify on the record. any concerns he has about the institutional interest of his prior offers are outweighed by the need for his testimony. punch bowl news is reporting this, quote, the january 6th select committee is likely to subpoena pat c
Of their reporting. in it, it says investigators were concerned that more documents were stashed at the club and the only way to account for them was to search the property. the justice department lacked probable cause to obtain a warrant from a judge. you think this is significant why? yeah. it s significant because they didn t have probable cause. when you have probable cause, it has to be current. it can t be something stale. i ve done 50, 60 search warrantses as a prosecutor and the big hurdle also is having current information that the evidence of the crime exists on the property, and here it was like a year before the search at mar-a-lago that they knew that he had this document relating to iran, that he had a map that he showed to people, but there was no current information that it existed at that time when they did the search warnt at mar-a-lago. so i would bet dollars to doughnuts that there are lots of
Department, this is a question of needing to act with e lack riddy because it is a four-year period and this is an important investigation. lisa monica was definitely trained by robert mueller at the fbi and is used to aking quickly and i think would be pressing that as would marshall miller, the number two to lisa monaco. so i think there will be some urgency and weave seen that in connection with search warrantses last week, but we haven t seen reports of the urgency with respect to interviews and grand jury subpoenas, but i would think after yesterday s testimony if the department did not know about that beforehand and shame on them if they did not, but they should be pressing for all of the corroboration to make sure that what miss hutchinson
Opposed to something that would actually help so many of their constituents? a couple of reasons. they assume, probably correctly, that in many of the states, low income working people aren t going vote. the projection is in the next election, 40% of the american people are will vote. probably 70 to 80% of low income workers won t vote. you don t have to pay attention. they are not going to vote. they are not making huge campaign contributions. they are not the koch brothers. study after study shows that congress listens to the people who make big campaign donations. not ordinary people or low income people who are struggling to survive. that s the sad reality of politics in america today. that s why i m spending the summer doing a freedom summer 2014. we have to get people out to vote. absolutely. senator sanders, thank you for your time tonight. thank you. still ahead, new search warrantses in the horrific case
The man prosecutor says hernandez shot to death execution style in june, and according to the bristol press newspaper, search warrantses suggest aaron hernandez may have jenkins to get rid of the murder weapon. and a video shows her carrying a ridge edobject the size of a lock box out of hernandez home and she drove away. she returned home and had no object. the warrantses indicate the fiancee may he dumped the gun in the woods or taken it to storage university somewhere. the faces no charge so far. you can t do that. no, you can t. under massachusetts law, it s obstruction of justice, and she could face up to a year in jail. the thing with the charge in massachusetts is that it can be fit to the crime. so she doesn t have to fall straightly within the parameters. they can actually adjust it to what they re charging her with.