and welcome to hannity. and tonight, begin with ait moment of gratitude, frankly, thanks to senateh republicans. in 2016, merrick garland will never on the us supreme and court, and it s now obvious the biden s age is more of aca political hack than even eric holdegr. and today, merrick garland was g grilled and exposed on the hilrl . take a look. this is a matter in dispute and discovery in that court. and i m going to leave it for the district court to make t courwe ll len after what youtn say when i say it s not in dispute. this is what he sai, thd. e o the court filing, jack smith s team said that we . not controlur those officers, they make their questions. we communicate with them, not whether you contro wit whethl, you communicate with them and we provide this can make money is not going to solvicatee problem. when the department of homeland security and the president of the united states refuse the lawof.refuwon t p now, we rsee going to bring you the full
garland appeared before the house judiciary committee [ y, where he was grilled and frankly, just beaten up and exposedd by lawmakers on, among other things, the lawfarexe that wagea against former president trump and continues to be waged. take rmer pre a look at some of the highlights. justice is no longer blindr n america today. it s driven by politics. d inexample number one, it s president trump. alvin bragg said. quote, i cannot see a world see in which i would indictumping and call mr. cohen as a prosecution witness. but that scall exactly what he d after president trump announced he running for president. we will use that to change the order of the documents that you seized. and the physical documents don t match up with the scanda l . you re supposed to do that as a prosecutor. this is a matter in dispute. and discovery in that court.d and i m going to leave it fore the district court to make a determinatioit for districn ai say. when i say it makes it not
you know, throughout this whole thing they took it ear justice they had over two hours ofusil. testimony reread to them this morning. clearly this was something th wanted to get right and had a lot of pressure on them to get it right and seems like a lot of people here tonight think they got it right. speaking of getting it right it was the defense who got it wrong. they really miscalculated. they had the option of having a change of venue and a different jury he elsewhere. they thought that the entire country heard with the scanda l and they felt that no where but in bellefonte could he get a fairer trial. may have got a fairer trial but the outcome wasn t one that the defense wanted and in retrospect that may have been a bad call. i don t know that i ever heard a defense counsel or ra e rarely so openly pessimistic about his or her chances as we were approaching deliberations from a jury.