strongly but the question is, how do you work with it. first of all there needs to be carveout for people who have covid who are not ready for the vaccine. they have immunity, too and shouldn t be marginalized. that is them per one. there needs to be a strategy for people who won t have the vaccine where you test people frequently. number three, bringing in national guard, federal workers, foreign health care workers, are you kidding me? how will they acclimate to a hospital in new york? you know what they will do, not know the hospital or infection controls guys, they will sped covid potentially. another example after politicization of a health care issue. really, really disturbing. should not be done. rachel: that is interesting question you bring up, what is more dangerous, having unvaccinated health care workers, perhaps some already had covid or say unvaccinated health care workers, versus new, either foreign or recently
why. we need to explain the real science about what is actually happening with covid-19. and i fear that i just fear the media ends up in the middle where we re covering date to day news but we missed the reason why the rules changed. that is right. and the why is trait forward. if you re vaccinated, you don t need a mask. there are certain settings where you should wear one to be part of the shared product of mask wearing and you don t need a mask in your outdoors even if your unvaccinated unless your in close conversation but i can t say unvaccinated, please get vaccinated, it is the single biggest thing to protect yourself. and for those of us in the media, it is hard because we don t have degrees in epidemiology but it is also that the same way that i think some of the experts have this bias toward extreme caution and making the mistake that extreme caution doesn t have any costs. extreme caution does have costs. tell me why. sometimes in the media, well