to the subpoena that was served, and the committee will now vote on whether to hold him in contempt. we can talk to ryan goodman professor of law at nyu law school. thanks very much been with us. the committee has published a live, dough might resolution setting out what they want to speak to murk meadows and aretha 20% into the 5th of january and it is meadows and aretha 20% into the 5th ofjanuary and it is significant because it says this. they report that murk meadows has told a mac told his supporters that the national guard would be to protect approach mike meadows. it really begs the question why did the national guard not turn up and he was involved in that decision? it he was involved in that decision? it is a really tantalising e mail that the committee has now publicised and it raises all sorts of questions and one of the questions it does raise is why the chief of staff would be saying that the national guard is ready to protect the pro trump people rather than protect