It does prevent her from tying the ventilator. that actually is a joke, barbara, because she spelled it the way that you spelled the joke, marshals. that was a joke, right, that was a joke. we are talking about martial law, and a rti al, and she spelled it marshal like this or you can make this up. it is quite unbelievable, but it is real life, we are living through it. if not relevant specifically to a perjury case, could this text message come up in another case? we were talking earlier about the conspiracy case by the doj. how else could this text messages be relevant? i do think it could be as part of this larger plot of conspiracy to defraud the united states. agreeing with others to try to prevent a legitimate function of government is a crime. to the extent that marjorie taylor greene and mark meadows and donald trump and others were working on a plan to try to prevent that from happening,
A better use of that statement is that she is now locked into a story. one of the reasons that people are asked to testify even when it is unlikely they ll take something useful is so that they are locked into a version of the story. for example, and be difficult for her to later say, when i said marshall law, whatever the met was the discount retailer, marshals. you said, last time, he did not remember it. italy slots are in. i do not know is enough to prosecute her for perjury. it does prevent her from tying the ventilator. that actually is a joke, barbara, because she spelled it the way that you spelled the joke, marshals. that was a joke, right, that was a joke. we are talking about martial law, and a rti al, and she spelled it marshal like this or you can make this up. it is quite unbelievable, but it is real life, we are living through it. if not relevant specifically to a perjury case, could this text