It seems the richard mclarens first report was intended to lead to the complete expulsion of the russian team from the rio games and the second report to expose the russian team from the punching games russian samples despite the flaws somehow only had micro skopec scratches the report revolves around the eyewitness account of grigori watch uncovered he is the former head of moscows anti doping lab and says he was one of the cogs in the dock in conspiracy in russia hes a wanted man facing charges for destroying doping samples and abusing authority dece is a clear violation of the burden of proof and assumption of innocence its a to kelly and legally not acceptable in doping cases it is a well established rule you have to prove as a doping agency that for ninety nine point nine percent somebody has doped Mclaren Report is not proven enough to make a collective ban on all athletes there must be Something Else and details is politics presumption of innocence out of the window guilty by as
They should be allowed to compete. Now one of the unmet criteria was the reinstatement of the Russian Anti Doping Agency by the world body but the Russian Paralympic Committee is not responsible for this organization so i why did they i. P. C. Make this demand on it. I think nicky that they had to try and give reasons why de were going to not just bought a russian athletes were trying to sort of say well look even dog rosado not a crazy were still left new zealand so theyre trying to use lots of reasons that really would not hold water in a court of law. Situation where sod they said themselves that the situation has greatly improved we no doubt living here ourselves and working here ourselves we see it daily. It doesnt make sense whatsoever and again we go back to thirty to thirty five our seats will go right now we believe but i do believe just more twists and turns yet to come in this tale. So we know that. No russian symbols and south korea the only places the athletes will be able
A serious source of concern for People Living here in kabul todays attack. Anyone for the Afghan National Security Forces remember they were killed not on the front line somewhere in some remote district or in the province where this is every day fighting i think that alone tells you that cities including kabul is becoming another. Front in the Afghan Government just continues to struggle to prevent these militants from carrying out these attacks. The country has seen a wave of deadly terror attacks recently with three of them in the past ten days alone. Were going. To. Be following the recent string of violence both president and the commander of u. S. And nato forces in afghanistan John Nicholson said washington would spend no effort to defeat the insurgents and bring peace to the region the taliban responded threatening more attacks in retaliation to what it calls a policy of aggression the us has considerably stepped up its campaign in the country over the past year in two thousand
Following that recent string of violence both President Trump and the commander of u. S. And nato forces in afghanistan John Nicholson said the washington will spare no effort to defeat the insurgents and to bring peace to the region the taliban knows responded threatening more attacks in retaliation to what its called a policy of aggression. The u. S. Has considerably stepped up its air campaign in the country over the past year in twenty seventeen washington dropped more than four thousand bombs on afghanistan between august and december last year the u. S. Carried out as many airstrikes as it did in the previous two years combined security and political analyst mushtaq are again believes that even though military action is important in the fight against extremists this alone will not bring peace to the region. A military offensive is always needed because you have to keep the militant groups from the main cities and from or from taking over the country and different provinces in dif