we watch the rally in southwestern ohio. have a great evening, everybody. preevent president trump: that s two protesters on tomorrow night, the headline wie protesters protesters. you don t have an of second one? be one welcome to tucker carlson tonight. the president is speaking a we will be taking portions of the live, especially t newsworthy moments. we also going to get to it last night s debate, tulsi gabbard of hawaii hit kamala harris harder than anyone has so far. a remarkable moment here will be talking to kelsey gever life you were not, we are going to go back to the president, speaking in ohio. president trump: from the fields of the great pocahontas, who is now lying and cheating her way to the presidency if possible. she s trying to win, remember? she defrauded people with her
credentials. she said she was indian. and i said, that i have more indian blood and then she does and i have none, i m sorry. and we drove her crazy. and we drove her crazy. that s a good
It sarcastically, if you are out of money you could get a court appointed lawyer. there are great lawyers that are court appointed. but if this is a stall tactic it is not going to work. you know, as part of the conditions for the former president, barred from intimidating witnesses or otherwise instruction in cases of obstructing on social media, what are the options actually available to a judge if he were to violate that agreement? he certainly will push it to the line or beyond, what can a judge really do? well, there is a range of options, and i am adamant that any judge would tread lightly here. so, one option is, you bring him into court and you say you did x, it violated my rule, do not do it again. to some degree we saw this in the roger stone prosecution. then that doesn t work, to bring it back again, and then you can cite him for contempt if it is a clear violation, you can cite him for contempt. you could wind up, there could be sanctions for that. you could wind up re
1992. is it an unusual conversation for the ag to have with the president or not? well, yes and no. let me try and explain that hallie. we ve had other attorneys general who work in political ways. robert kennedy, attorney general, was a political adviser to his brother, president john kennedy and eric holder filled much of the same role for president barack obama. so the question isn t whether an attorney general has a legitimate political role. they do. they re a member of the president s cabinet. they can advice on policy or legislation or help in the selection of judges. the really important question is when that political role seeps into the criminal and civil enforcement mechanisms of the department of justice. if that happens, that s awful. that s really, really bad. we saw some of that with attorney general barr. we saw it both in the paul manafort prosecution and in the roger stone prosecution and the way we saw it is we saw the reaction from career assistant u.s. attorneys
They, still, could charge him with obstruction of justice. and those charges are incredibly serious. under the sentencing guidelines, which are the guidelines that federal judges look to for guidance in how to sentence crimes. obstruction of justice faces a minimum guidelines range of 15-to-21 months in jail. so, they really are quite serious, if proven true. yeah. that that the pattern you just identified there. or the the sort of precedent, right? which is what we saw largely in the roger stone prosecution. stone was it wasn t obstruction but it was it was perjury, right? that he perjured himself under oath. that he also lied to congress. and stone was convicted. unanimously, by a jury of his peers. he, then, was, you know, sentenced and then he was pardoned by the president. so, there s some there is some precedent here. i want to just read the the what investigators apparently are zeroing in on and get your reaction to it, which is this. the obstruction inquiry st
Investigators in this case do not develop enough information to charge representative gaetz with the sex crimes that they are reportedly looking into, they still could charge him with obstruction of justice. and those charges are incredibly serious under the sentencing guidelines, which are the guidelines that federal judges look to for guidance in how to sentence crimes. obstruction of justice faces a minimum guidelines range of 50 to 20 man months in jail. so they really are quite serious. the pattern you just cited there, the president right? which was what we saw largely in the roger stone prosecution. stone was an obstruction, but it was perjury. he perjured himself under oath. and he also lied to congress. and stone was convicted unanimously by a jury of his peers. he then was sentenced and then he was pardoned by the president.