washington. he appointed the first 13 u.s. marshals. the president still appoints the u.s. marshals confirmed by the senate. if you would thin think in law t that would change as the director and the deputy direct director. we have a couple more. i m just curious from the spouse perspective what is it like? i m curious also, sir. thank you for asking the question. in her the microphone. i m the type of person i don t really think about it and i don t think about what he does. i keep myself busy but when i do think about it i kind of forget. he was always good at keeping in touch and what they are and what they were doing but there were a few times that he wasn t calling and you know that is the things that happened whether they got in a car accident or somebody, you know, was taken to the hospital so it was one of those things that when you think about it, you freak out because i am more worried about when you are in dc with the sniper case watching tv and when they w
the current court is moving rather frightening way to some people in the direction of reviewing laws that affect the economy in a serious way. for example, laws that were passed in vermont to make it harder for pharmaceutical companies to jack up charged by giving information about drugs to certain doctors so that there were prescribed more costly. the court struck that down on the basis of the first amendment. after four joined the conservatives and match. breyer went almost apoplectic. this is a return of what was called the locker area, the time from the 1890 s in 1937 when the court was striking down economic legislation rather loosely. if you strike down an economic legislation simply because it deals with speech in one way or another, it deals with information information is at the heart of almost everything. and using the first amendment that way could give the court the kind of power that i think is presuppose in your question. some people think that is exactly what