not with edison, certainly. this is the second immediate tim e we ve reviewed their budget. he has certainly been the case that if there was a deficiency identified, where one thing was corrected, it went back and forth. because the petitions are supposed to be complete perfected a, when they come to us, we have not had the back and forth to do that. if we had unlimited time and staff to do that. so the only chance was when a clarification can on the actual verses rounding it out. if i am looking at something like this and looking at an average, it takes away those kind of things. it is not the maximum amount for every individual person. they take into account how many people use their wives health insurance and independent, so what and so forth. this is based on how many people are to the health insurance and how many people are not. these are the kinds of thing is where if the assumption is not put forward in a clear way, we re going to have some issues about that. t
all of the parents are worried right now because she is coming back this year. all of the students, parents, they are scared that the students might be assigned to her class. students and parents deal with different substitutes [unintelligible] they deserve to be taught by teachers that are good role models. we re not sure if she is physically ill or mentally ill because we are not doctors. for a person to be absent 70% of the year, it is not really inconsistent. the packet that you are holding in your hand right now, these are the samples of the parent s letters written to our principal. we get no response. there are approximately 500 signatures in the package. we have approximately 40 parents over here. it is hard to assemble that many people together around for the day s meeting today s meeting. what you guys are looking at right now is a very great problem that we have. [beeping] is my minute up already? i ll wrap it up. what can the school board do for us and the child
recommendations, it did not sound like that happened. not with edison, certainly. this is the second immediate tim e we ve reviewed their budget. he has certainly been the case that if there was a deficiency identified, where one thing was corrected, it went back and forth. because the petitions are supposed to be complete perfected a, when they come to us, we have not had the back and forth to do that. if we had unlimited time and staff to do that. so the only chance was when a clarification can on the actual verses rounding it out. if i am looking at something like this and looking at an average, it takes away those kind of things. it is not the maximum amount for every individual person. they take into account how many people use their wives health insurance and independent, so what and so forth. this is based on how many people are to the health insurance and how many people are not. these are the kinds of thing is where if the assumption is not put forward in a cl
presentation. is it to clarify those things? did you have any opportunity to have dialogue with edison? as you were making recommendations, it did not sound like that happened. not with edison, certainly. this is the second immediate tim e we ve reviewed their budget. he has certainly been the case that if there was a deficiency identified, where one thing was corrected, it went back and forth. because the petitions are supposed to be complete perfected a, when they come to us, we have not had the back and forth to do that. if we had unlimited time and staff to do that. so the only chance was when a clarification can on the actual verses rounding it out. if i am looking at something like this and looking at an average, it takes away those kind of things. it is not the maximum amount for every individual person. they take into account how many people use their wives health insurance and independent, so what and so forth. this is based on how many people are to the hea
take place before that? they can come and answer the questions that have been stated here? that is the purpose that comes to the budget meeting for the presentation. is it to clarify those things? did you have any opportunity to have dialogue with edison? as you were making recommendations, it did not sound like that happened. not with edison, certainly. this is the second immediate tim e we ve reviewed their budget. he has certainly been the case that if there was a deficiency identified, where one thing was corrected, it went back and forth. because the petitions are supposed to be complete perfected a, when they come to us, we have not had the back and forth to do that. if we had unlimited time and staff to do that. so the only chance was when a clarification can on the actual verses rounding it out. if i am looking at something like this and looking at an average, it takes away those kind of things. it is not the maximum amount for every individual person. they