cases, for example. the flip side of this that putt it in contrast is saying you might be able to call the folks injured and killed riot everies, looters or arsonists if the evidence shows that s what they were. it appears the lawyers zero in on the self defense. what more do we know about how both will go about making the cases? it s not clear there s much evidence to show what we would call victims in the case involved in any looting or rioting or arson before they were shot. there is some video evidence to show that they confronted rittenhouse and you might argue that you don t want to confront someone with a semiautomatic