The georgia case is for a lot of these we need translators, former prosecutors. What fani willis charged was the clearest thing we all saw with our own eyes. And i had this conversation in the 8 00 hour. What trump told his voters his first year as president in 2017 from a podium was dont believe what you see, dont believe what you hear, only believe me. And what fani willis indicted yesterday just blows that out of the water. In state court we could see with our own eyes. And my understanding again, youre the lawyer in these conversations was that if this, then that. So if this criminal enterprise with us corrupt in nature and all in pursuance of a crime, then all of these acts were a part of it and all these people were a part of it. From the outside having worked in politics, thats what it looked like to me. So, to read that narrative is what made that indictment, the fourth in just a few short months, different from the others. I agree. I think you put that very well. Sometimes we
prosecutor or a fair-minded expert would say the calls are and the d.a. doesn t claim that. this is important. we re going to hear more about this going into cases and trials. what this d.a. is saying and what legal experts and rico experts will tell you is those calls are now evidence amidst the wider plots. they become acts to advance the conspiracy precisely because there was a conspiracy, because there was evidence of the wider plots involving several people. and again, a plot was not to chat with officials, double-check the numbers. the plot was to illegally steal and overturn the results. to take trump s lie that he won and try to criminally enact it. that s why the other trump aides are charged now for the first time. some of them are more associated, frankly, with propaganda than other types of physical criminality. take trump s spokesperson and lawyer jenna ellis. after trump lost and again,
fresh sign that prosecutors may be building a sprawling case under georgia s racketeering laws. the post reports, among willis latest areas of scrutiny is the trump campaign s expenditure of more than $1 million on two firms to study whether electoral fraud occurred in the 2020 election, the two individuals with knowledge of the probe said. the washington post first reported earlier this year that the work was carried out in the final weeks of 2020 and the campaign never released the findings because, wait for it, their firm, simpatico software systems, and berkeley research, disputed many of trump s theories and could not offer any proof that he was the rightful winner of the election. in recent days, willis office has asked both firms for information, not only about georgia, but other states as well. trump contested the 2020 election result in georgia, arizona, michigan, nevada, pennsylvania, and wisconsin. rico experts that s