hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are benedicte paviot who is the uk correspondent at france 2a and sebastian payne, the whitehall editor of the financial times. tomorrow s front pages. tomorrow s front pages starting with. the row over downing street parties continues the metro leads with the headline downing it street as email evidence emerges of a drinks party held in the number ten garden during the first lockdowm, when large groups were banned from meeting outdoors. the i leads on the same story it says that the invitation was sent by the prime minister s principal private secretary to more than a hundred people. in the daily mail witnesses say that boris johnson and his wife carrie were among the a0 guests attending the party. but the prime minister has declined to say whether he was among those there. the times says the prime minister is piling pressure on his scientific advisers to cut the covid is
on a community in orange county, southern cal of you. the orders of the court have been duly entered and certified with the clerk. we will hear argument in case 2088, the federal bureau of investigations versus fazaga. the states secret privilege is firmly grounded in the constitution and the common law and is critical to safeguarding the national security. the ninth circuit did not disagree with the district court s conclusion that the information concerning that foreign intelligence investigation at issue here falls within that privilege. the ninth circuit instead held that section section 1806(f) of pfizer displaces the state secrets privilege and requires this state to adjudicate the merits of plaintiffs challenged using the very information that is covered by the privilege. that novel interpretation cannot be squared with the text, context, or purpose of section 1806(f). that section s purpose is to provide a special mechanism for the suppression of evidence when the
displaces the states secrets privilege and requires the district court to adjudicate the merits of plaintiff s challenge using the very information that is covered by the privilege. that novel interpretation cannot be squared with the text context or purpose. that section s purpose is to provide a special mechanism for the suppression of evidence when the government seeks to use it against an aggrieved person in a judicial proceeding or other proceeding. the ninth circuit s first rationale was that the government uses information against a party when it invokes the states secrets privilege. but the government invokes the privilege to prevent the use of information not to facilitate its use. indeed in this case the government argued and the district court agreed that because the information concerning the reasons, the subjects, the sources and methods of this foreign intelligence investigation was so central to the case, that the case the first amendment claim had to be dism
investigations versus fazaga. the states secret privilege is firmly grounded in the constitution and the common law and is critical to safeguarding the national security. the ninth circuit did not disagree with the district court s conclusion that the information concerning that foreign intelligence investigation at issue here falls within that privilege. the ninth circuit instead held that section section 1806(f) of pfizer displaces the state secrets privilege and requires this state to adjudicate the merits of plaintiffs challenged using the very information that is covered by the privilege. that novel interpretation cannot be squared with the text, context, or purpose of section 1806(f). that section s purpose is to provide a special mechanism for the suppression of evidence when the government seeks to use it against an aggrieved person in a judicial proceeding or other proceeding. the ninth circuit s first rationale was that the government uses information against a pa
on a community in orange county, southern cal of you. the orders of the court have been duly entered and certified with the clerk. we will hear argument in case 2088, the federal bureau of investigations versus fazaga. the states secret privilege is firmly grounded in the constitution and the common law and is critical to safeguarding the national security. the ninth circuit did not disagree with the district court s conclusion that the information concerning that foreign intelligence investigation at issue here falls within that privilege. the ninth circuit instead held that section section 1806(f) of pfizer displaces the state secrets privilege and requires this state to adjudicate the merits of plaintiffs challenged using the very information that is covered by the privilege. that novel interpretation cannot be squared with the text, context, or purpose of section 1806(f). that section s purpose is to provide a special mechanism for the suppression of evidence when the