Somebody really caught in the middle of it, and that doesnt excuse the person from the consequences. Professors, weve talked about abuse of power and bribery. When we started, we said we would also discuss Obstruction Of Congress. So id like to ask you some questions about Obstruction Of Congress. Professor gerhardt, in your view, is there enough evidence here to charge President Trump with the high crime and misdemeanor of Obstruction Of Congress . I think theres more than enough. As i mention in my statement, just to really underscore this, the third article of impeachment approved by the House Judiciary Committee against president nixon charged him with misconduct because he failed to comply with four legislative subpoenas. Here it is far more than four that this president has failed to comply with and hes ordered
the Executive Branch as well not to cooperate the congress. Those together with a lot of other evidence suggests Obstruction Of Congress. Professor karlan, do you agree .
from giving contributions to candidates. the reason is that denies us the right to self-government. justice brett kavanaugh was so correct in seeing this. they didn t even need to hear argument to know it s constitutional to keep foreigners out of our election process. professor feldman, you were somewhat of an impeachment skeptic at the time of the release of the mueller report, were you not? i was. what s changed for you, sir? what changed for me was the rev haitielation of the july 25l and the evidence that emerged subsequently of the president of the united states in a format where he was heard by others and now known to the whole public openly abused his office by seeking a personal advantage in order to get himself reelected and act against the national security of the united states. that is precisely the situation